Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug;43(6):1337-1343.
doi: 10.1002/nau.25319. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

Can we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data?: ICI-RS 2023

Affiliations
Review

Can we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data?: ICI-RS 2023

Andrew Gammie et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: A "Think Tank" at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting held in Bristol, United Kingdom in June 2023 considered the progress and promise of machine learning (ML) applied to urodynamic data.

Methods: Examples of the use of ML applied to data from uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies and imaging were presented. The advantages and limitations of ML were considered. Recommendations made during the subsequent debate for research studies were recorded.

Results: ML analysis holds great promise for the kind of data generated in urodynamic studies. To date, ML techniques have not yet achieved sufficient accuracy for routine diagnostic application. Potential approaches that can improve the use of ML were agreed and research questions were proposed.

Conclusions: ML is well suited to the analysis of urodynamic data, but results to date have not achieved clinical utility. It is considered likely that further research can improve the analysis of the large, multifactorial data sets generated by urodynamic clinics, and improve to some extent data pattern recognition that is currently subject to observer error and artefactual noise.

Keywords: artifical intelligence; machine learning; pattern recognition; urodynamic data; urodynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Ethical Data Foundation. https://openletter.worldethicaldata.org/en/openletter/. Accessed July 20, 2023.
    1. Hobbs KT, Choe N, Aksenov LI, et al. Machine learning for urodynamic detection of detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2022;159:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.027 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weaver JK, Weiss DA, Aghababian A, et al. Why are pediatric urologists unable to predict renal deterioration using urodynamics? A focused narrative review of the shortcomings of the literature. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(4):493–498. - PubMed
    1. Gammie A, Kessler TM. Half the message is just mess: judging the value of urodynamics based on partial or poor-quality results. BJU Int. 2020;126:4–5. doi: 10.1111/bju.15063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarassenko L. A Guide to Neural Computing Applications. Arnold; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources