Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 3;408(1):427.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03165-z.

Postoperative computed tomography findings predict re-drainage cases after early drain removal in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Affiliations

Postoperative computed tomography findings predict re-drainage cases after early drain removal in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Nobuhito Nitta et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for re-drainage in patients with early drain removal after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 114 patients who underwent PD and prophylactic drain removal on postoperative day (POD) 4 between January 2012 and March 2021. We analyzed the risk factors for re-drainage according to various factors. Peri-pancreaticojejunostomic fluid collection (PFC) index and pancreatic cross-sectional area (CSA) were evaluated using computed tomography on POD 4. The PFC index was calculated by multiplying the length, width, and height at the maximum aspect.

Results: Among the 114 patients, 15 (13%) underwent re-drainage due to postoperative pancreatic fistula. Multivariate analysis identified a PFC index ≥ 8.16 cm3 on POD 4 (odds ratio [OR], 20.40, 95%CI 2.38-174.00; p = 0.006) and pancreatic CSA on POD 4 ≥ 3.65 cm2 (OR, 16.40, 95%CI 1.57-171.00; p = 0.020) as independent risk factors for re-drainage.

Conclusion: A careful decision might be necessary for early drain removal in patients with a PFC index ≥ 8.16 cm3 and pancreatic CSA ≥ 3.65 cm2.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Early drain removal; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Re-drainage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D et al (2012) Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 152:S56–S63 - PubMed
    1. Vollmer CM Jr, Lewis RS, Hall BL et al (2015) Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index. Ann Surg 261:527–536 - PubMed
    1. McMillan MT, Vollmer CM Jr, Asbun HJ et al (2016) The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade C fistulas gollowing pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 20:262–276 - PubMed
    1. Mackay TM, Smits FJ, Roos D et al (2020) The risk of not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide analysis. HPB (Oxford) 22:233–240 - PubMed
    1. Bonaroti JW, Zenati MS, Al-Abbas AI et al (2021) Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on long-term oncologic outcomes after pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 23:1269–1276 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources