Validation of a Multiscale Computational Model Using a Mock Circulatory Loop to Simulate Cardiogenic Shock
- PMID: 37923315
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002062
Validation of a Multiscale Computational Model Using a Mock Circulatory Loop to Simulate Cardiogenic Shock
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to characterize the hemodynamics of cardiogenic shock (CS) through a computational model validated using a mock circulatory loop (MCL) and to perform sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation studies after the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Validation and Verification (V&V) guidelines. The uncertainties in cardiac cycle time ( ), total resistance ( ), and total volume ( ) were quantified in the MCL and propagated in the computational model. Both models were used to quantify the pressure in the left atrium, aorta (Ao), and left ventricle (LV), along with the flow through the aortic valve, reaching a good agreement. The results suggest that 1) is the main source of uncertainty in the variables under study, 2) showed its greatest impact on the uncertainty of Ao hemodynamics, and 3) mostly affected the uncertainty of LV pressure and Ao flow at the late-systolic phase. Comparison of uncertainty levels in the computational and experimental results was used to infer the presence of additional contributing factors that were not captured and propagated during a first analysis. Future work will expand upon this study to analyze the impact of mechanical circulatory support devices, such as ventricular assist devices, under CS conditions.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S: Cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 8: 1–12, 2019.
-
- van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline: Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 136: e232–e268, 2017.
-
- Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, et al.: Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 3: e000590, 2014.
-
- Thiele H, Allam B, Chatellier G, Schuler G, Lafont A: Shock in acute myocardial infarction: The Cape Horn for trials? Eur Heart J. 31: 1828–1835, 2010.
-
- Wang JI, Lu DY, Feldman DN, et al.: Outcomes of hospitalizations for cardiogenic shock at left ventricular assist device versus non–left ventricular assist device centers. J Am Heart Assoc. 9: e017326, 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources