Meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology: A systematic review of normative values and cut-offs for diagnostic criteria

Abstract

Background: Meniscus extrusion is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal injury, but the literature on this topic has not yet been systematized. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare diagnostic methods and summarize the data of medial and lateral meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies that measured meniscal extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). Meniscal extrusion data was summarized as weighted mean for medial and lateral meniscus, and stratified according to the method of measurement (MRI or US) and presence of knee osteoarticular pathology.

Results: A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Weighted mean values of meniscal extrusion were always higher for the medial than the lateral meniscus, regardless of the method of measurement. The medial meniscus extrusion was always higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology than those without. For the lateral meniscus extrusion, the mean values were higher in those knees without osteoarticular pathology. When classifying pathological meniscal extrusion with pre-defined cut-off values, the higher the cut-off used, the lower the percentage of knees classified as pathological meniscal extrusion.

Conclusions: The medial meniscus presents on mean higher extrusion and extrusion is higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology. Based on summary data, the most suitable cut-offs for pathological meniscal extrusion for both MRI and US seem to fall within >2 and >3 mm.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Meniscal extrusion; Meniscus extrusion; Ultrasound.