Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 5;15(10):e46514.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.46514. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Delivery Methods in Twin Gestations: Evaluating Outcomes, Risk Factors, and the Paradigm Shift Towards Elective Cesarean Deliveries

Affiliations
Review

Delivery Methods in Twin Gestations: Evaluating Outcomes, Risk Factors, and the Paradigm Shift Towards Elective Cesarean Deliveries

Merin Abraham et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

During the past decade, there has been a consistent rise in the number of twin births and the number of overall cesarean sections (CS) worldwide. This is owed to a variety of social, economic, educational, and scientific factors. More women are opting to advance their professional careers and gain financial stability before having children. Although this approach is understandable, a new set of challenges are faced as a result, the most important of which has been infertility due to advanced maternal age and the subsequent use of assisted fertility treatments, which have been noted to cause multiple gestations. Twin gestations are considered high-risk pregnancies and are associated with an amplitude of potential complications. Arguably, the biggest decision an obstetrician must make when dealing with this population is choosing the most appropriate mode of delivery. Given the lack of clear guidance pertaining to twin deliveries, CSs may often be perceived as safer and are often preferred over vaginal deliveries (VD). In this narrative review, we aimed to compare the outcomes of different delivery methods (CS versus VD) to investigate whether CS is truly superior to VD. Data were collected from the past two decades and analyzed based on the neonatal and maternal outcomes for each delivery mode. Our results indicate that planned VD is just as safe as CS, if not superior, in most uncomplicated twin pregnancies. Thus, it is best to advise and encourage healthy expecting twin carriers to undergo VD and explore any hesitations or fears they might have. Furthermore, a detailed guideline regarding twin delivery is essential to establish and better navigate twin deliveries, lower the rate of unnecessary CSs, and reduce overall twin gestation morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: c-section; cesarean deliveries; elective cesarean section; fetal loss; intrauterine fetal death; maternal morbidity. maternal death; spontaneous vaginal delivery; twin gestation; twin pregnancies; vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Protocol for the management of twin pregnancies
This image has been created by the authors based on the information provided by Jha P. et al. [1]. MCA: middle cerebral artery; TTTS: twin-twin transfusion syndrome

References

    1. US evaluation of twin pregnancies: importance of chorionicity and amnionicity. Jha P, Morgan TA, Kennedy A. Radiographics. 2019;39:2146–2166. - PubMed
    1. Labor and delivery of twin pregnancies. Melka S, Miller J, Fox NS. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44:645–654. - PubMed
    1. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. [ Jul; 2023 ];2021 2021, June 16. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continu... 2021 2023:16.
    1. Rising cesarean deliveries in India: medical compulsions or convenience of the affluent? Kumar R, Lakhtakia S. Health Care Women Int. 2021;42:611–635. - PubMed
    1. Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008. Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, El-Sayed YY, Blumenfeld YJ. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1095–1101. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources