A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation
- PMID: 37928049
- PMCID: PMC10622588
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.005
A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation
Abstract
Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%-20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence.
Methodology: A retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores.
Results: Patients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %.
Keywords: Anterior instability; Arthroscopic repair; Bankart repair; Glenoid bone loss; Subscapularis augmentation.
© 2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series.Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Apr;101(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0446-8. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017. PMID: 28004306
-
Clinical outcomes and recurrence rate of 4 procedures for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: ASA, remplissage, open, and arthroscopic Latarjet: a multicenter study.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):931-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.030. Epub 2022 Dec 5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 36470517
-
Benefits of bone graft augmentation to arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jul;28(7):2325-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05746-2. Epub 2019 Oct 30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31667568
-
Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair for Anterior Instability of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;51(10):2758-2765. doi: 10.1177/03635465221094832. Epub 2022 Jun 24. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 35749344
-
Glenoid Bone Loss in Recurrent Shoulder Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Nov 15;105(22):1815-1821. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00388. Epub 2023 Aug 29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023. PMID: 37643239
Cited by
-
Anterior shoulder dislocation: A bibliometric analysis in the past two decades (2003-2022).Heliyon. 2024 Jun 6;10(11):e32488. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32488. eCollection 2024 Jun 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38961893 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Results After Latarjet Procedure for Shoulder Instability Management Between Primary and Revision Cases After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Procedure: A Midterm Follow-up Study.Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 19;13(6):23259671251343807. doi: 10.1177/23259671251343807. eCollection 2025 Jun. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40546994 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Burkhart S.S., De Beer J.F. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of Arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2000;16(7):677–694. - PubMed
-
- Wolf E.M., Arianjam A. Hill-Sachs remplissage, an arthroscopic solution for the engaging hill-sachs lesion: 2- to 10-year follow-up and incidence of recurrence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(6):814–820. - PubMed
-
- Maiotti M., Massoni C., Russo R., Schroter S., Zanini A., Bianchedi D. Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of Bankart Repair in chronic anterior shoulder instability with bone loss less than 25% and capsular deficiency: clinical multicenter study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;33(5):902–909. - PubMed
-
- Symeonides PanP. The significance of the subscapularis muscle in the pathogenesis of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British. 1972;54-B(3):476–483. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources