A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation
- PMID: 37928049
- PMCID: PMC10622588
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.005
A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation
Abstract
Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%-20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence.
Methodology: A retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores.
Results: Patients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %.
Keywords: Anterior instability; Arthroscopic repair; Bankart repair; Glenoid bone loss; Subscapularis augmentation.
© 2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Burkhart S.S., De Beer J.F. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of Arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2000;16(7):677–694. - PubMed
-
- Wolf E.M., Arianjam A. Hill-Sachs remplissage, an arthroscopic solution for the engaging hill-sachs lesion: 2- to 10-year follow-up and incidence of recurrence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(6):814–820. - PubMed
-
- Maiotti M., Massoni C., Russo R., Schroter S., Zanini A., Bianchedi D. Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of Bankart Repair in chronic anterior shoulder instability with bone loss less than 25% and capsular deficiency: clinical multicenter study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;33(5):902–909. - PubMed
-
- Symeonides PanP. The significance of the subscapularis muscle in the pathogenesis of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British. 1972;54-B(3):476–483. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources