Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 19:14:1270207.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270207. eCollection 2023.

The role of attention and health goals in nudging healthy food choice

Affiliations

The role of attention and health goals in nudging healthy food choice

Marleen Gillebaart et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nudging is a promising intervention technique that supports people in pursuing their healthy eating goals. Recent research suggests that, despite previous assumptions, disclosure of the presence of a nudge does not compromise nudge effectiveness. However, it is unknown whether attention to a nudge affects nudge effects. We assessed the role of attention systematically, by examining explicit and implicit attention to nudges, while also exploring healthy eating goals as a potential moderator.

Methods: Participants were assigned to a nudge (i.e., a shopping basket inlay with pictures of healthy items) or control condition (i.e., a shopping basket inlay with neutral pictures) and chose a snack in an experimental supermarket field study. Explicit and implicit attention (with a mobile eye-tracker) to nudges, healthiness of snack choice, and healthy eating goals were assessed.

Results: Results showed that attention to the nudge did not hamper the nudge's effect. Furthermore, individuals with strong healthy eating goals made healthier food choices in the nudge condition. Individuals with weak to non-existent healthy eating goals were not influenced by the nudge.

Discussion: Findings are in line with the viewpoint that nudging does not by definition work 'in the dark', and suggests that nudges support people in adhering to their healthy eating goal.

Keywords: attention; experimental field study; food choices; healthy eating goals; nudging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pictures used in the nudge condition (A) and the control condition (B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiken L. S., West S. G., Reno R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    1. Arno A., Thomas S. (2016). The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 16:676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3272-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bago B., De Neys W. (2017). Fast logic?: examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition 158, 90–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benjamins J. S., Hessels R. S., Hooge I. T. (2018). “GazeCode: open-source software for manual mapping of mobile eye-tracking data” in proceedings-ETRA 2018 (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).)
    1. Blom S. S., Gillebaart M., De Boer F., van der Laan N., De Ridder D. T. (2021). Under pressure: nudging increases healthy food choice in a virtual reality supermarket, irrespective of system 1 reasoning. Appetite 160:105116. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105116 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources