Effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and depressive symptom clusters: Data from the eIMPACT trial
- PMID: 37931480
- PMCID: PMC10842310
- DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115581
Effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and depressive symptom clusters: Data from the eIMPACT trial
Abstract
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are lower in people with depression and are normalized following pharmacological treatment. However, it is unknown if psychological treatments for depression improve BDNF and if change in BDNF is a mediator of intervention effects on depressive symptoms. Therefore, using data from the eIMPACT trial, we sought to determine the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on 12-month changes in BDNF and cognitive/affective and somatic depressive symptom clusters and to examine whether BDNF changes mediate intervention effects on depressive symptoms. 216 primary care patients with depression from a safety net healthcare system were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. Plasma BDNF was measured with commercially available kits, and depressive symptom clusters were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The intervention did not influence BDNF but did improve both the cognitive/affective and somatic clusters over 12 months. Changes in BDNF did not mediate the intervention effect on either cluster. Our findings suggest that modernized collaborative care is an effective treatment for both the cognitive/affective and somatic symptoms of depression and that the mechanism of action is not improvements in BDNF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690.
Keywords: Affective symptoms; Antidepressant medication; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Internet-based intervention; Primary health care; Randomized controlled trial; Somatic symptoms.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare related to the subject matter of this article. JCS received grants from the NIH. J.C.S. received advisory fees from Boston Medical Center.
Figures
References
-
- Arean P, Hegel M, Vannoy S, Fan MY, Unuzter J, 2008. Effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for older, primary care patients with depression: results from the IMPACT project. Gerontologist 48 (3), 311–323. - PubMed
-
- Beijers L, Wardenaar KJ, van Loo HM, Schoevers RA, 2019. Data-driven biological subtypes of depression: systematic review of biological approaches to depression subtyping. Molecular Psychiatry 24 (6), 888–900. - PubMed
-
- Bocchio-Chiavetto L, Bagnardi V, Zanardini R, Molteni R, Gabriela Nielsen M, Placentino A, Giovannini C, Rillosi L, Ventriglia M, Riva MA, Gennarelli M, 2010. Serum and plasma BDNF levels in major depression: A replication study and meta-analyses. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 11 (6), 763–773. - PubMed
-
- Boku S, Nakagawa S, Toda H, Hishimoto A, 2018. Neural basis of major depressive disorder: Beyond monoamine hypothesis. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences 72 (1), 3–12. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
