Different Perspectives of Spanish Patients and Professionals on How a Dialysis Unit Should Be Designed
- PMID: 37933306
- PMCID: PMC10625860
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S434081
Different Perspectives of Spanish Patients and Professionals on How a Dialysis Unit Should Be Designed
Abstract
Aim: The opinion of hemodialysis patients, professionals and family members is rarely considered in the design of a hemodialysis unit.
Purpose: To know and compare the opinion and preferences of patients, family members and professionals regarding the design of a dialysis unit and the potential activities they believe should be carried out during the session in order to provide architects with real information for the construction of a dialysis center.
Patients and methods: Anonymous and voluntary survey in electronic format addressed to patients, relatives and professionals belonging to the 18 hemodialysis centers of the renal foundation and to ALCER and its different delegations, in relation to leisure activities to be carried out in the dialysis center and preferred design of the treatment room. The results obtained between the patient-family group and the professionals were compared.
Results: We received 331 responses, of which 215 were from patients and family members (65%) and 116 (35%) from professionals. The most represented category among professionals was nursing (53%), followed by assistants (24%) and physicians (12.9%). A higher proportion of patients (66%) preferred rooms in groups of 10-12 patients as opposed to professionals who preferred open-plan rooms (p<0.001). The options that showed the most differences between patients and professionals were chatting with colleagues and intimacy (options most voted by patients/families), versus performing group activities and visibility (professionals).
Conclusion: The professionals' view of patients' needs does not always coincide with the patients' perception. The inclusion of the perspective of people with kidney disease continues to be a pending issue in which we must improve both patient organizations and professionals, and the opinion of professionals and patients must be included in the design of a dialysis unit and the activities to be developed in it.
Keywords: dialysis unit design; healthcare professionals; hemodialysis; patient experience; patients; preferences.
© 2023 Arenas Jiménez et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Mr Juan Carlos Julián Mauro reports that in the last 3 years, his employer has received financial aid from the following companies related to the treatment of people with kidney conditions: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Baxter, CSL Vifor, Diaverum Services, Fresenius Medical Care, GSK, Hansa Biopharma and Novartis. These aids were in no case intended for this research. The author reports no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
End-of-life and palliative care of patients on maintenance hemodialysis treatment: a focus group study.BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 30;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0481-y. BMC Palliat Care. 2019. PMID: 31666038 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27819974
-
Barriers to Home Hemodialysis Across Saskatchewan, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey of In-Center Dialysis Patients.Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Aug 10;7:2054358120948293. doi: 10.1177/2054358120948293. eCollection 2020. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020. PMID: 32843987 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on peritoneal dialysis at home: implications for the management of a chronic condition. A study protocol.J Adv Nurs. 2012 Aug;68(8):1847-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05907.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28. J Adv Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22211446 Review.
-
Kidney disease in Paraguay.Kidney Int Suppl. 2005 Aug;(97):S120-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09720.x. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16014089 Review.
References
-
- Remón Rodríguez C, Quirós Ganga PL, González-Outón J, et al. Equipo multidisciplinario para la organización y gestión del hospital de día médico de nefrología. recovering activity and illusion: the nephrology day care unit. Nefrologia. 2011;31(5):545–559. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Jul.11006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Guía de Programación y Diseño – unidades de Hemodiálisis: ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo- Dirección General de Planificación Sanitaria:Madrid, abril [Programming and Design Guide – Hemodialysis Units: Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs- General Directorate of Health Planning: Nefrologia]; 1986. (consultado 21/10/2022).
-
- Solozábal C, Pérez García R, Martí A, et al. Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Características estructurales de las unidades de hemodiálisis. Guías de centros de hemodiálisis [Structural features of hemodialysis unit. Hemodialysis centers guides]. Nefrología. 2006;26(Suppl 8):5–10. - PubMed
-
- Alcalde-Bezholda G, Alcázar-Arroyo R, Angoso-de-guzmán M, et al. Guía de unidades de hemodiálisis 2020. Nefrologia. 2021;41(supl 1):1–77.
-
- de Depuración Extrarrenal U. Estándares y recomendaciones de calidad y seguridad informes, estudios e investigación 2011 ministerio de sanidad, política social e igualdad [Extrarenal Purification Unit. QUALITY AND SAFETY STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. REPORTS, STUDIES AND RESEARCH 2011 MINISTRY OF HEALTH, SOCIAL POLICY AND EQUALITY]. Available from: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/EERR/UDE.... Accessed October 21, 2022.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources