Clinical and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions involving the ostial left circumflex coronary artery
- PMID: 37933728
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30903
Clinical and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions involving the ostial left circumflex coronary artery
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous treatment for ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions is known to be associated with suboptimal results.
Aims: The present study aims to assess the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo ostial LCx lesions overall and according to the coronary revascularization strategy.
Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with second generation drug eluting stents or drug coated balloons for de novo ostial LCx lesions in three high-volume Italian centers between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, and repeat revascularization.
Results: A total of 366 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 901 (IQR: 450-1728) days. 79.5% of the patients were male, 33.6% were diabetic, 49.7% had a previous PCI, and 23.1% a prior surgical revascularization. Very ostial LCx stenting was performed in 34.1%, crossover from left main to LCx in 17.3%, and a two-stent strategy in 48.6% of cases, respectively. In the overall population, the incidence of TVR at 2 years was 19.0% while MACCE rate was 25.7%. No major differences in clinical outcomes were found according to the stenting strategy. Use of intracoronary imaging was associated with fewer MACCE (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-1.13, p = 0.01), while the diameter of the stent implanted in the ostial LCx was associated with less TVR (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.75, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Percutaneous revascularization of the ostial LCx is associated with a high rate of TVR, regardless of the stenting strategy. Intracoronary imaging and proper stent sizing may reduce the failure rates.
Keywords: BIFL: bifurcation lesions; CAD: coronary artery disease; IVUS: imaging, intravascular ultrasound.
© 2023 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Musallam A, Chezar-azerrad C, Torguson R, et al. Procedural outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in the ostial and proximal left circumflex coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2020;135:62-67. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.014
-
- Kawasaki T, Koga H, Serikawa T, et al. The bifurcation study using 64 multislice computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(5):653-658. doi:10.1002/ccd.21916
-
- Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al. 3-dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease. JACC: Cardiovasc Interve. 2010;3(1):41-48. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.019
-
- Medina A, de Lezo JS, Pan M. Una clasificación simple de las lesiones coronarias en bifurcación. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006;59(2):183.
-
- Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635-2650. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
