Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Dec;12(23):21159-21171.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6680. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of RC48-ADC alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective clinical study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Real-world effectiveness and safety of RC48-ADC alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective clinical study

Jingwei Xu et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Previous RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) studies established that the safety and efficacy of RC48-antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), either alone or combined with toripalimab, for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients exhibiting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or even HER2-negative status after standard chemotherapy failure.

Methods: With locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), patients who received RC48-ADC monotherapy or a combination with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors between August 2021 and October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study to evaluate the real-world antitumor effectiveness and safety.

Results: Among the 38 enrolled patients (29 males; median age 67.5 years [38-93]), 8 received RC48-ADC monotherapy, while 30 received combination therapy. Initially, 63.2% (24/38) of the patients had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and 63.2% (24/38) had visceral metastasis. UC of the bladder represented the majority type in 68.4% (26/38) of cases. By the data cutoff in March 2023, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 63.2% (95% CI, 47.1%-79.2%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.5% (95% CI, 79.3%-99.7%). Median follow-up time was 10.6 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.5), with a 6-month PFS rate of 63.2% and a 12-month PFS rate of 34.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 12-month OS rate of 76.7%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-10.0) among 24 patients evaluated as partial response (PR). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (71.1%), anorexia (57.9%), asthenia (52.6%), hypoesthesia (52.6%), bone marrow suppression (47.4%), alopecia (47.4%), nausea (44.7%), proteinuria (36.8%), vomiting (34.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (31.6%). No patient experienced TRAEs of Grade ≥3. One patient had an immune-related adverse event (irAE) of rash related to toripalimab.

Conclusions: Both as monotherapy and in combination with PD-1 inhibitors, RC48-ADC exhibits promising effectiveness and manageable safety profile for mUC patients in real-world settings.

Keywords: antibody-drug conjugate; disitamab vedotin; metastatic urothelial carcinoma; real-world study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors indicate no financial or non‐financial interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) PFS and (B) OS curves for all patients. (C) PFS curves for patients who received RC48 as the first‐line treatment group and ≥2nd‐line treatment group, respectively. (D) PFS curve for patients who received a combination therapy of RC48‐ADC and PD‐1 inhibitors. (E) PFS curves for patients who received combination therapy as the first‐line treatment group and ≥2nd‐line treatment group, respectively. (F) PFS curves for patients who received different combination therapies.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Swimmer plot for response evaluation. Start 1 means the time when the patient was first evaluated as PR.

References

    1. von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, et al. Long‐term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4602‐4608. - PubMed
    1. Changfa X, Xuesi D, He L, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):584‐590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhisheng X, Zijie Y, Jingyu M, Yongtian L, Yan Z. Temporal trends and projections of bladder cancer burden in China from 1990 to 2030: findings from the global burden of disease study. Clin Epidemiol. 2022;14:1315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joaquim B, Hans vM, Mead GM, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC intergroup study 30987. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(10):1107‐1113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xinan S, Haige C, Bin H, et al. Safety, efficacy and biomarker analysis of Toripalimab in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from a multicenter phase II trial POLARIS‐03. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American association for. Cancer Res. 2022;28(3):489‐497. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances