Functioning and recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a comparison between pre-stroke frail and non-frail patients
- PMID: 37935943
- PMCID: PMC10754730
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00885-9
Functioning and recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a comparison between pre-stroke frail and non-frail patients
Abstract
Purpose: Pre-stroke frailty in older adults is associated with adverse outcomes after stroke in community-based and hospital-based populations. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of pre-stroke frailty among older stroke survivors receiving medical specialistic rehabilitation and its association with outcomes and recovery.
Methods: Pre-stroke frailty was measured by the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI, score ≥ 4 indicates frailty) in patients ≥ 65 years receiving stroke medical specialistic rehabilitation. Baseline, follow-up and change (i.e. recovery) scores of the Barthel index (BI), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 'mobility', 'communication', and 'memory and thinking', Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EuroQoL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) were compared between frail and non-frail patients with a multivariable regression model adjusting for confounders.
Results: Of 322 included patients (34.2% females, median age 70 years), 43 (13.4%) patients reported pre-stroke frailty. There were no differences in BI or in destination of discharge between pre-stroke frail and non-frail stroke survivors receiving inpatient rehabilitation. However, pre-stroke frailty was associated with worse follow-up scores for all other measures. Recovery in pre-stroke frail patients was less favorable compared to non-frail patients for SIS mobility, HADS subscales and EQ-5D index and visual analogue scale.
Conclusion: Pre-stroke frailty was present in a minority of older stroke survivors receiving medical specialistic rehabilitation. BI and destination of discharge did not differ. Nevertheless, pre-stroke frailty was associated with worse functioning at follow-up for most measures of health status and with smaller improvements in mobility, mood and quality of life.
Keywords: Frailty; Outcomes; Rehabilitation; Stroke.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
-
- Rodríguez-Laso Á, Mora MÁC, Sánchez IG, Mañas LR, Bernabei R, Gabrovec B, Hendry A, Liew A, O'Caoimh R, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Antoniadou E, Carriazo AM, Galluzzo L, Redón J, Targowski T, on behalf of all ADVANTAGE Joint Action partners (2018) State of the art report on the prevention and management of frailty. Joint Action ‘724099 / ADVANTAGE’. https://www.advantageja.eu/images/SoAR-AdvantageJA_Fulltext.pdf - PubMed
-
- Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA, Ershler WB, Harris T, Fried LP. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):991–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical