Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0293083.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293083. eCollection 2023.

A multi-taxon analysis of European Red Lists reveals major threats to biodiversity

Axel Hochkirch  1   2   3   4   5 Melanie Bilz  6   7   8 Catarina C Ferreira  8   9 Anja Danielczak  2 David Allen  10 Ana Nieto  8   11 Carlo Rondinini  12   13 Kate Harding  10 Craig Hilton-Taylor  10 Caroline M Pollock  10 Mary Seddon  3   14 Jean-Christophe Vié  4   15   16 Keith N A Alexander  17 Emily Beech  18 Manuel Biscoito  19   20 Yoan Braud  5 Ian J Burfield  21   22 Filippo Maria Buzzetti  5   23 Marta Cálix  8   24 Kent E Carpenter  25 Ning Labbish Chao  26 Dragan Chobanov  5   27 Maarten J M Christenhusz  28 Bruce B Collette  29 Mia T Comeros-Raynal  30   31 Neil Cox  32 Matthew Craig  33 Annabelle Cuttelod  34 William R T Darwall  10 Benoit Dodelin  17 Nicholas K Dulvy  35 Eve Englefield  8   36 Michael F Fay  37 Nicholas Fettes  8   38 Jörg Freyhof  39 Silvia García  40 Mariana García Criado  8   41 Michael Harvey  25 Nick Hodgetts  42 Christina Ieronymidou  43 Vincent J Kalkman  44 Shelagh P Kell  45 James Kemp  8 Sonia Khela  46 Richard V Lansdown  7 Julia M Lawson  34   47 Danna J Leaman  48 Joana Magos Brehm  45   49 Nigel Maxted  45 Rebecca M Miller  34 Eike Neubert  50 Baudewijn Odé  5   51 David Pollard  52 Riley Pollom  53 Rob Pople  21 Juan José Presa Asensio  54 Gina M Ralph  25 Hassan Rankou  37 Malin Rivers  18   55 Stuart P M Roberts  56 Barry Russell  57 Alexander Sennikov  58 Fabien Soldati  59 Anna Staneva  21 Emilie Stump  25 Andy Symes  21 Dmitry Telnov  60   61   62 Helen Temple  63 Andrew Terry  64 Anastasiya Timoshyna  48   65 Chris van Swaay  66 Henry Väre  58 Rachel H L Walls  67 Luc Willemse  5   44 Brett Wilson  68 Jemma Window  10 Emma G E Wright  36 Thomas Zuna-Kratky  5   69
Affiliations

A multi-taxon analysis of European Red Lists reveals major threats to biodiversity

Axel Hochkirch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a major global challenge and minimizing extinction rates is the goal of several multilateral environmental agreements. Policy decisions require comprehensive, spatially explicit information on species' distributions and threats. We present an analysis of the conservation status of 14,669 European terrestrial, freshwater and marine species (ca. 10% of the continental fauna and flora), including all vertebrates and selected groups of invertebrates and plants. Our results reveal that 19% of European species are threatened with extinction, with higher extinction risks for plants (27%) and invertebrates (24%) compared to vertebrates (18%). These numbers exceed recent IPBES (Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) assumptions of extinction risk. Changes in agricultural practices and associated habitat loss, overharvesting, pollution and development are major threats to biodiversity. Maintaining and restoring sustainable land and water use practices is crucial to minimize future biodiversity declines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. IUCN Red List status of 14,669 European species.
Abbreviations: EX: Extinct, EW: Extinct in the Wild, RE: Regionally Extinct, CR: Critically Endangered, EN: Endangered, VU: Vulnerable, DD: Data Deficient, NT: Near Threatened, LC: Least Concern.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Species richness in Europe.
Spatial distribution of terrestrial and freshwater species richness in Europe based on an analysis of all European IUCN Red List assessments.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Major threats to biodiversity in Europe.
For all species, vertebrates, invertebrates and plants (CR: Critically Endangered, EN: Endangered, VU: Vulnerable, DD: Data Deficient, NT: Near Threatened, LC: Least Concern; N: All species = 14,669, Vertebrates = 2,494, Invertebrates = 7,600, Plants = 4,575).

References

    1. Butchart SHM, Walpole W, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, et al.. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science 2010; 328: 1164–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJB, Collen B. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 2014; 345: 401–406. doi: 10.1126/science.1251817 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL, Boyce DG, Britten GL, Butchart SHM, et al.. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 2014; 346: 241–244. doi: 10.1126/science.1257484 - DOI - PubMed
    1. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany; 2019.
    1. Hoffmann M, Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Hawkins AFA, James RE, et al.. Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List. Endanger. Species Res. 2008; 6: 113–125.

Publication types