Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):816.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05293-8.

What do we not know (yet) about recovery colleges? A study protocol on their (cost-)effectiveness, mechanisms of action, fidelity and positioning

Marloes M C van Wezel  1   2 , Christien Muusse  3 , Dike van de Mheen  4 , Ben Wijnen  5   6 , Wouter den Hollander  5 , Hans Kroon  4   3
Affiliations

What do we not know (yet) about recovery colleges? A study protocol on their (cost-)effectiveness, mechanisms of action, fidelity and positioning

Marloes M C van Wezel et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Recovery Colleges (RCs) have spread across the globe as a new way of supporting people with mental vulnerabilities in their recovery journey. RCs focus on 'learning' rather than 'curing' and in that line facilitate a transition from being a passive, dependent patient/client to an active, empowered student learning to live life, despite vulnerabilities. Peer support and co-creation are central in RCs, as peers learn from each other by sharing personal experiences with mental vulnerabilities in an accessible, inspiring and stimulating atmosphere. The implementation of RCs is highly encouraged internationally, and as a result RCs and related self-help initiatives increasingly emerge. However, high-quality research on RCs is scarce and there is a call for thorough investigation of (cost-)effectiveness, mechanisms of action, cross-border fidelity and positioning of RCs. In response, this research project aims to fill these gaps.

Methods: This research project entails (1) a prospective quasi-experimental effectiveness study and economic evaluation, (2) a multifaceted qualitative study to elaborate on the mechanisms of action of RCs for those involved (3) a study to develop a (Dutch) Fidelity Measure of Recovery Colleges, and (4) an organisational case study to describe the positioning of RCs in relation to other mental health care services and community-based initiatives. Following the ideals of co-creation and empowerment in RCs we conduct this research project in co-creation with RC students from Enik Recovery College in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Discussion: This research project will lead to one of the first longitudinal controlled quantitative evaluations of both cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of RC attendance in a broad sense (beyond attending courses alone). Moreover, we will gather data on a micro level (i.e., impact on RC students), meso level (i.e., organisational fidelity) and macro level (i.e., positioning in the care and support domain), capturing all important perspectives when scrutinizing the impact of complex systems. Finally, we will demonstrate the validity and value of embracing experiential knowledge in science as a complementary source of information, leading to a more profound understanding of what is researched.

Trial registration: The prospective quasi-experimental study has been pre-registered at clinicaltrails.gov (#NCT05620212).

Keywords: Co-creation; Cost-effectiveness; Effectiveness; Empowerment; Fidelity; Mental health care; Protocol; Recovery; Recovery Colleges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant timeline of the five wave study design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Slade M, Amering M, Farkas M, Hamilton B, O’Hagan M, Panther G, et al. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):12–20. doi: 10.1002/wps.20084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental Illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 1993;16(4):11–23. doi: 10.1037/h0095655. - DOI
    1. van Os J, Kohne ACJ. It is not enough to sing its praises: the very foundations of precision psychiatry may be scientifically unsound and require examination. Psychol Med. 2021;51(9):1415–7. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iasiello M, van Agteren J. Mental health and/or mental Illness: a scoping review of the evidence and implications of the dual-continua model of mental health. Evid Base: J Evid Reviews Key Policy Areas. 2020;1:1–45. doi: 10.21307/eb-2020-001. - DOI
    1. World Health Organisation. Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020 2013 [Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021.

Publication types

Associated data