Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 23:3:1148887.
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1148887. eCollection 2023.

Assessing the pre-implementation context for financial navigation in rural and non-rural oncology clinics

Affiliations

Assessing the pre-implementation context for financial navigation in rural and non-rural oncology clinics

Victoria M Petermann et al. Front Health Serv. .

Abstract

Background: Financial navigation (FN) is an evidence-based intervention designed to address financial toxicity for cancer patients. FN's success depends on organizations' readiness to implement and other factors that may hinder or support implementation. Tailored implementation strategies can support practice change but must be matched to the implementation context. We assessed perceptions of readiness and perceived barriers and facilitators to successful implementation among staff at nine cancer care organizations (5 rural, 4 non-rural) recruited to participate in the scale-up of a FN intervention. To understand differences in the pre-implementation context and inform modifications to implementation strategies, we compared findings between rural and non-rural organizations.

Methods: We conducted surveys (n = 78) and in-depth interviews (n = 73) with staff at each organization. We assessed perceptions of readiness using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale. In-depth interviews elicited perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing FN in each context. We used descriptive statistics to analyze ORIC results and deductive thematic analysis, employing a codebook guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to synthesize themes in barriers and facilitators across sites, and by rurality.

Results: Results from the ORIC scale indicated strong perceptions of organizational readiness across all sites. Staff from rural areas reported greater confidence in their ability to manage the politics of change (87% rural, 76% non-rural) and in their organization's ability to support staff adjusting to the change (96% rural, 75% non-rural). Staff at both rural and non-rural sites highlighted factors reflective of the Intervention Characteristics (relative advantage) and Implementation Climate (compatibility and tension for change) domains as facilitators. Although few barriers to implementation were reported, differences arose between rural and non-rural sites in these perceived barriers, with non-rural staff more often raising concerns about resistance to change and compatibility with existing work processes and rural staff more often raising concerns about competing time demands and limited resources.

Conclusions: Staff across both rural and non-rural settings identified few, but different, barriers to implementing a novel FN intervention that they perceived as important and responsive to patients' needs. These findings can inform how strategies are tailored to support FN in diverse oncology practices.

Keywords: cancer; financial navigation; financial toxicity; implementation science; organizational readiness framework for advancing implementation science; rural.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SW, KR, and DR receive grant funding paid to their institution from Pfizer Foundation. LS receives grant funding paid to her institution from AstraZeneca/Merk. CS is employed by Flatiron Health. MG serves in a consulting/advisory role for Sensal Health. DR receives research funding from National Comprehensive Cancer Network and receives royalties from Oxford University Press book sales of The Group: Seven Widowed Fathers Reimagine Life and Up To Date chapters in the palliative care section. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Zafar SY. Financial toxicity of cancer care: it’s time to intervene. J Natl Cancer Inst . (2016) 108(5). - PubMed
    1. Zafar SY, Abernethy AP. Financial toxicity, part I: a new name for a growing problem. Oncology (Williston Park). (2013) 27(2):80–1, 149. PMCID: PMC4523887 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coroneos CJ, Lin YL, Sidey-Gibbons C, Asaad M, Chin B, Boukovalas S, et al. Correlation between financial toxicity, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in an insured population of breast cancer surgical patients: a single-institution retrospective study. J Am Coll Surg . (2021) 232(3):253–63. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dee EC, Nipp RD, Muralidhar V, Yu Z, Butler SS, Mahal BA, et al. Financial worry and psychological distress among cancer survivors in the United States, 2013–2018. Support Care Cancer. (2021) 29(9):5523–35. 10.1007/s00520-021-06084-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rotter J, Spencer JC, Wheeler SB. Financial toxicity in advanced and metastatic cancer: overburdened and underprepared. J Oncol Pract. (2019) 15(4):e300–7. 10.1200/JOP.18.00518 - DOI - PMC - PubMed