Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May-Aug;18(2):123-132.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1585.

Gradual Correction of Valgus Deformities of the Tibia Using a Monolateral External Fixator

Affiliations

Gradual Correction of Valgus Deformities of the Tibia Using a Monolateral External Fixator

D P Motta et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023 May-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To present a review of patients subjected to gradual correction of a valgus deformity of the tibia using a monolateral external fixator.

Method: This retrospective review included patients from January 2012 to May 2022 who met the following inclusion criteria: deviation of mechanical axis of the limb due to valgus deformity of the tibia; tibial deformity in the coronal plane on radiographic examination; a documented outpatient pre-operative evaluation by an orthopaedic surgeon and age between 10 and 70 years. The following exclusion criteria were applied: the presence of another tibia deformity preventing gradual correction using the proposed assembly; skin conditions incompatible with the surgical procedure; inadequate pre- or post-operative radiological evaluation; and insufficient information in the medical records.

Results: The mean age of patients with a valgus deformity of the tibia was 30.8 ± 15.9 years. These patients had a body mass index (BMI) of 26.1 ± 5.5 kg/m2. A congenital or developmental aetiology was attributed to 58.3% of the cases. Most commonly, the deformity was found in the middle third of the tibia with a mean deformity of 14.7 ± 6.6 degrees. The total external fixator time ranged from 73 to 229 days (average 149.7 ± 36.1 days). The mean medial proximal and lateral distal tibial angles differed significantly for pre- and post-operative measurements (p ≤ 0.05). There were complications in eight cases; five cases of pin site infections, two cases of medial cortical fracture and one case of peroneal nerve neuropraxia.

Conclusion: The proposed correction technique produces a satisfactory angular correction and with similar outcomes as described in the literature.

How to cite this article: Motta DP, Faria JLR, Couto A, et al. Gradual Correction of Valgus Deformities of the Tibia Using a Monolateral External Fixator. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):123-132.

Keywords: External fixation; Monolateral; Osteotomy; Tibia deformity; Valgus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figs 1A to F
Figs 1A to F
Surgery steps. Images from fluoroscopy (reedited from Motta et al.). (A) Apex of deformity; (B) Marking first pin parallel to articular surface; (C) Two pins on proximal tibia; (D) Two pins on distal tibia; (E) Partial osteotomy of tibia; (F) Complete osteotomy of tibia
Figs 2A to C
Figs 2A to C
Radiograph pre- and post-operative. (A) Pre-operative; (B) Post-operative; (C) Final radiograph
Figs 3A to C
Figs 3A to C
Post-operatives clinical images (from Motta et al.). (A) Pre-operative; (B) 3 weeks post-operative; (C) 5 weeks post-operative
Flowchart 1
Flowchart 1
Database search for patients with tibial valgus deformity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between the total external fixator time and degree of deformity
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Complications during the deformity correction process
Figs 6A to E
Figs 6A to E
(A) Valgus deformity of the tibia on the right side; (B) Soft tissue contours in the presence of an individual with high volume soft tissue bulk may mask the underlying skeletal deformity especially if the deformity is less than moderate; (C) Clinical illustration of patient in (B) showing this masking effect; (D) Soft tissue contours in the presence of an individual with a slim build and valgus deformity in the tibia; (E) Clinical illustration of patient in (D) Showing loss of this masking effect

References

    1. Springer B, Bechler U, Waldstein W, et al. The influence of femoral and tibial bony anatomy on valgus OA of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(9):2998–3006. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05734-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denduluri S, Lu M, Bielski R. Development of genu valgum after removal of osteochondromas from the proximal tibia. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015;25(6):582–586. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodier WD, Calder PR. External fixation for the correction of adult post-traumatic deformities. Injury. 2019;50(Suppl 1):S36–S44. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cerqueira FDS, Motta GATA, Rocha de Faria JL, et al. Controlled double gradual opening osteotomy for the treatment of severe varus of the knee—Blount's Disease. Arthrosc Tech. 2021;10(9):e2199–e2206. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.05.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He A, Mao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Preoperative planning by osteotomy master software helps to improve the accuracy of target limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:504. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02033-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources