How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process
- PMID: 37942504
- DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14242
How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process
Abstract
Inversions are structural mutations that reverse the sequence of a chromosome segment and reduce the effective rate of recombination in the heterozygous state. They play a major role in adaptation, as well as in other evolutionary processes such as speciation. Although inversions have been studied since the 1920s, they remain difficult to investigate because the reduced recombination conferred by them strengthens the effects of drift and hitchhiking, which in turn can obscure signatures of selection. Nonetheless, numerous inversions have been found to be under selection. Given recent advances in population genetic theory and empirical study, here we review how different mechanisms of selection affect the evolution of inversions. A key difference between inversions and other mutations, such as single nucleotide variants, is that the fitness of an inversion may be affected by a larger number of frequently interacting processes. This considerably complicates the analysis of the causes underlying the evolution of inversions. We discuss the extent to which these mechanisms can be disentangled, and by which approach.
Keywords: adaptation; balanced polymorphisms; chromosomal rearrangements; inversions; linkage; neutrality; recombination; selection.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adzhubei, I. A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V. E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A. S., & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010). A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nature Methods, 7, 248-249.
-
- Anderson, A. R., Hoffmann, A. A., McKechnie, S. W., Umina, P. A., & Weeks, A. R. (2005). The latitudinal cline in the in(3R)Payne inversion polymorphism has shifted in the last 20 years in Australian Drosophila melanogaster populations. Molecular Ecology, 14, 851-858.
-
- Arunkumar, R., Wang, W., Wright, S. I., & Barrett, S. C. (2017). The genetic architecture of tristyly and its breakdown to self-fertilization. Molecular Ecology, 26, 752-765.
-
- Auer, T. O., & Del Bene, F. (2014). CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN-mediated knock-in approaches in zebrafish. Methods, 69, 142-150.
-
- Aulard, S., Vaudin, P., Ladevèze, V., Chaminade, N., Périquet, G., & Lemeunier, F. (2004). Maintenance of a large pericentric inversion generated by the hobo transposable element in a transgenic line of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 92, 151-155.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- NSF-DEB 1655701/Directorate for Biological Sciences
- NSF-OCE 2043905/Directorate for Biological Sciences
- ERC AdG 101055327/European Commission
- European Society for Evolutionary Biology
- 2020.00275.CEECIND/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- CEECIND/02616/2018/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- PTDC/BIA- 1232 EVL/1614/2021/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- RPG-2021-141/Leverhulme Trust
- 315287/Norges Forskningsråd
- 310030_204681/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- 31003A-182262/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- PZ00P3_185952/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- 2021-05243/Vetenskapsrådet
- 2018-03695/Vetenskapsrådet