Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;27(4):597-603.
doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

Invasive Brain Computer Interface for Motor Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Invasive Brain Computer Interface for Motor Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Jordan J Levett et al. Neuromodulation. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review of the literature.

Objectives: In recent years, brain-computer interface (BCI) has emerged as a potential treatment for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). This is the first systematic review of the literature on invasive closed-loop BCI technologies for the treatment of SCI in humans.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Ovid EMBASE was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: Of 8316 articles collected, 19 studies met all the inclusion criteria. Data from 21 patients were extracted from these studies. All patients sustained a cervical SCI and were treated using either a BCI with intracortical microelectrode arrays (n = 18, 85.7%) or electrocorticography (n = 3, 14.3%). To decode these neural signals, machine learning and statistical models were used: support vector machine in eight patients (38.1%), linear estimator in seven patients (33.3%), Hidden Markov Model in three patients (14.3%), and other in three patients (14.3%). As the outputs, ten patients (47.6%) underwent noninvasive functional electrical stimulation (FES) with a cuff; one (4.8%) had an invasive FES with percutaneous stimulation, and ten (47.6%) used an external device (neuroprosthesis or virtual avatar). Motor function was restored in all patients for each assigned task. Clinical outcome measures were heterogeneous across all studies.

Conclusions: Invasive techniques of BCI show promise for the treatment of SCI, but there is currently no technology that can restore complete functional autonomy in patients with SCI. The current techniques and outcomes of BCI vary greatly. Because invasive BCIs are still in the early stages of development, further clinical studies should be conducted to optimize the prognosis for patients with SCI.

Keywords: Brain-computer interfaces; electrocorticography; microelectrodes; spinal cord injuries; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Alexander G. Weil is a paid consultant for Monteris Medical, Inc and a Clinical Advisory Board member for Synergia. Lior M. Elkaim is an employee with Neuralink. The remaining authors reported no conflict of interest.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources