Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;17(11):e0011730.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011730. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Performance of diagnostic tests for Trypanosoma brucei brucei in experimentally infected pigs

Affiliations

Performance of diagnostic tests for Trypanosoma brucei brucei in experimentally infected pigs

Kadidiata Ilboudo et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Animal African trypanosomosis is an important vector-borne disease of livestock in sub-Saharan Africa. Pigs seem relatively tolerant to trypanosome infection and could act as a reservoir of trypanosomes affecting animals and humans. Our ability to reliably detect trypanosome infection in pigs depends on the performance of diagnostic tools, which is not well known. In pigs experimentally infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei, we evaluated the performance of parasitological Buffy Coat Technique (BCT), two molecular (TBR and 5.8S PCR) and four serological tests (CATT, HAT Sero-K-Set rapid diagnostic test-RDT, indirect ELISA, immune trypanolysis). Most diagnostic tests showed high specificity, estimated at 100% (95% CI = 74-100%) with the exception of CATT and RDT whose specificity varied between 100% (95% CI = 74-100%) to 50% (95% CI = 7-93%) during the experiment. The sensitivity of each test fluctuated over the course of the infection. The percentage of positive BCT over the infection (30%) was lower than of positive PCR (56% and 62%, depending on primers). Among the serological tests, the percentage of positive tests was 97%, 96%, 86% and 84% for RDT, ELISA, immune trypanolysis and CATT, respectively. Fair agreement was observed between both molecular tests (κ = 0.36). Among the serological tests, the agreement between the ELISA and the RDT was substantial (κ = 0.65). Our results on the T.b. brucei infection model suggest that serological techniques are efficient in detecting the chronic phase of infection, PCR is able to detect positive samples several months after parasites inoculation while BCT becomes negative. BCT examination and RDT are useful to get a quick information in the field, and BCT can be used for treatment decision. ELISA appears most suited for epidemiological studies. The selection of diagnostic tests for trypanosomosis in pigs depends on the context, the objectives and the available resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Boxplot of the percentages of positive time points to each test estimated per pig.
The points represent the percentages of positive tests for each pig of the infected group estimated from 7 DPI until the end of the experiment. The central line represents the median, the box the interquartile range. Each pig is represented by a specific color.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Individual result of the eight pigs of the infected group in BCT and PCR tests.
Top: positivity in BCT, Bottom left: positivity in 5.8S PCR. Bottom right: positivity in TBR PCR. Large red points: positive test; small red points: negative test; DPI: days post infection.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Individual result of all pigs to the four serological tests (ELISA, TL LiTat 1.6, RDT and CATT).
Large points: positive test; small points: negative test. Pigs of the infected group are indicated in red, pigs of the control group in green. DPI: days post infection.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Evolution of the estimated sensitivity during the experiment for each diagnostic test (up parasitological and PCR tests, down serological tests).
DPI: days post-infection. For a minimal sensitivity of 0%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0–37%, for a maximal sensitivity of 100%, 95% CI = 63–100%, for a medium sensitivity of 50%, 95% CI = 16–84%.

References

    1. Kristjanson PM, Swallow BM, Rowlands GJ, Kruska RL, de Leeuw PN. Measuring the costs of African animal trypanosomosis, the potential benefits of control and returns to research. Agric Syst. 1999; 59: 79–98.
    1. Swallow BM. Impacts of trypanosomiasis on African agriculture. Rome: FAO. 2000; 46 p.
    1. Taylor K, Authié EML. Pathogenesis of animal trypanosomiasis. In: Maudlin I., Holmes P. H. and Miles M. A. The Trypanosomiases. Wallingford, UK; 2004. pp. 331–353.
    1. Uilenberg G, Boyt WP. A field guide for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of African animal trypanosomosis. New ed. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998; https://www.fao.org/3/x0413e/x0413/e00.htm
    1. Jordan AM. Tsetse flies as vectors of trypanosomes. Vet Parasitol. 1976; 2: 143–152. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(76)90059-5 - DOI