Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;18(1):851.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04215-4.

Fracture risk after intralesional curettage of atypical cartilaginous tumors

Affiliations

Fracture risk after intralesional curettage of atypical cartilaginous tumors

Gitte G J Krebbekx et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: The need for curettage of atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT) is under debate. Curretage results in defects that weaken the bone potentially leading to fractures. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively determine postoperative fracture risk after curettage of chondroid tumors, including patient-specific characteristics that could influence fracture risk.

Methods: A total of 297 adult patients who underwent curettage of an ACT followed by phenolisation and augmentation were retrospectively evaluated. Explanatory variables were, sex, age, tumor size, location, augmentation type, and plate fixation. The presence of a postoperative fracture was radiologically diagnosed. Included patients had at least 90 days of follow-up.

Results: A total of 183 females (62%) were included and 114 males (38%), with an overall median follow-up of 3.2 years (IQR 1.6-5.2). Mean diameter of the lesions was 4.5 (SD 2.8) cm. Patients received augmentation with allograft bone (n = 259, 87%), PMMA (n = 11, 3.7%), or did not receive augmentation (n = 27, 9.1%). Overall fracture risk was 6%. Male sex (p = 0.021) and lesion size larger than 3.8 cm (p < 0.010) were risk factors for postoperative fracture.

Interpretation: Curettage of ACT results in an overall fracture risk of 6%, which is increased for males with larger lesions.

Keywords: ACT; Fracture risk; Orthopedic oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart, in-, and exclusion criteria
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
One-year fracture risk, overall
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
One-year fracture risk, sex
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
One-year fracture risk, size
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
One-year fracture risk, plate fixation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
One-year fracture risk, age
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
One-year fracture risk, lower and upper extremities
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Risk groups

References

    1. Dierselhuis EF, Gerbers JG, Ploegmakers JJ, Stevens M, Suurmeijer AJ, Jutte PC. Local treatment with adjuvant therapy for central atypical cartilaginous tumors in the long bones: analysis of outcome and complications in one hundred and eight patients with a minimum follow-up of two years. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2016;98(4):303–313. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00472. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans HL, Ayala AG, Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer. 1977;40(2):818–831. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197708)40:2<818::AID-CNCR2820400234>3.0.CO;2-B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD, van Rijswijk CS, Krol AD, Taminiau AH, et al. The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist. 2008;13(3):320–329. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0237. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nota SP, Braun Y, Schwab JH, van Dijk CN, Bramer JA. The identification of prognostic factors and survival statistics of conventional central chondrosarcoma. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:623746. doi: 10.1155/2015/623746. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Praag Veroniek VM, Rueten-Budde AJ, Ho V, Dijkstra PDS, Study group B, Soft tissue t et al. Incidence, outcomes and prognostic factors during 25 years of treatment of chondrosarcomas. Surg Oncol. 2018;27(3):402–408. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.009. - DOI - PubMed