Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0294255.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294255. eCollection 2023.

Exam stress and the metacognitive strategies of reading in students with dyslexia: The role of motivational mechanisms and educational support

Affiliations

Exam stress and the metacognitive strategies of reading in students with dyslexia: The role of motivational mechanisms and educational support

Kamil Kuracki et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Despite numerous studies on dyslexia, there is still a lack of empirical data on the factors determining the functioning of students with dyslexia in the context of written exams. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify the relationship between sources of stress in an exam situation and the reported use of reading strategies by dyslexic students in terms of motivation and therapeutic interventions in the educational environment. This descriptive-analytical study used data from a larger project focused on children with and without dyslexia. The research sample (n = 640) included girls (n = 280) and boys (n = 360) aged between 14 and 15 years (M = 14.40, SD = 0.55), attending the 7th or 8th grade in Polish mainstream primary schools. Random and intentional sampling was used. All students completed four questionnaires. The results were analyzed using regression analysis in Model templates for PROCESS v4 for SPSS by Hayes. The study showed significant weak and moderate positive correlations between the sources of exam stress and the reading strategies reported by students, ranging from 0.186 to 0.570, as well as significant moderate and strong correlations between reading strategies and experienced educational support, ranging from 0.229 to 0.505, and between reading strategies and motivation to read, ranging from 0.582 to 0.701. The type of stress source significantly influenced the selection of specific reading strategies. Motivation acted as a mediator, while educational support was a moderator in the relationship between exam stress and the reported use of reading strategies. Based on our results, the source of stress may be perceived as factors activating metacognitive mechanisms aimed at selecting appropriate strategies for working with texts. Researchers and teachers should be aware of the need to undertake activities to support students with dyslexia focused on developing the ability to recognize the sources of exam stress and select effective coping strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Adlof SM. Promoting reading achievement in children with developmental language disorders: What can we learn from research on specific language impairment and dyslexia?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2020; 63(10): 3277–3292. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lauterbach AA, Park Y, Lombardino LJ. The roles of cognitive and language abilities in predicting decoding and reading comprehension: comparisons of dyslexia and specific language impairment. Annals of Dyslexia.2017; 67(3): 201–218. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0139-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snowling M., Adams J, Bowyer-Crane CA., & Tobin V. Levels of literacy among juvenile offenders: the incidence of specific learning disabilities. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 2000; 10(4): 229–241. 10.1002/cbm.362. - DOI
    1. Wong AM-Y, Ho CS-H, Au T K-F, McBride C, Ng A K-H, Yip L P-W, et al. Reading comprehension, working memory and higher level language skills in children with SLI and/or dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2016; 30(2): 337–361. 10.1007/s11145-016-9678-0. - DOI
    1. Bishop D V M., & Snowling M J. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin. 2004; 130(6): 858–888. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858 - DOI - PubMed