Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;92(5):1375-1393.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12895. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

The structure of aggressive personality

Affiliations

The structure of aggressive personality

David S Chester et al. J Pers. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to factor analyze a broad array of aggression measures to identify a comprehensive, coherent factor structure for this construct.

Background: Measures and models of trait aggression have multiplied to the point of incoherence.

Method: In Study 1, a diverse sample of 922 undergraduates completed a battery of items acquired from 42 self-report aggression questionnaires. In Study 2, we administered a curated item pool to another diverse sample of 1447 undergraduates, alongside criterion measures.

Results: We curated an initial item pool of 734 items down to 289 items that exhibited sufficient variability, were not redundant with other items, and possessed strong loadings onto a central 'trait aggression' factor. These remaining items were best characterized by a six-factor structure, which captured relational, angry, violent, retaliatory, intimate partner, and alcohol forms of aggression. We estimated their hierarchical structure, correlations with their original aggression scales, Five Factor Model trait dimensions, impulsivity facets, and found them to be robust to gender composition and the inclusion of alcohol-naive and intimate-partner-naive participants.

Conclusions: This factor structure mostly supported widely-accepted models of aggressive personality that focus on its overt and relational forms and reactive functions, though proactive aggression only loosely emerged as a distinct entity. We retained the final items as the Comprehensive Aggression Scale (CAS).

Keywords: Comprehensive Aggression Scale; aggression measurement; bass‐ackwards; factor analysis; trait aggression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allen, J. J., & Anderson, C. (2017). Aggression and violence: Definitions and distinctions. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1–14). John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja personality questionnaire (ZKA–PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman personality questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(5), 416–431.
    1. Ando, A., Soga, S., Yamasaki, K., Shimai, S., Shimada, H., Utsuki, N., Oashi, O., & Sakai, A. (1999). Development of the Japanese version of the Buss–Perry aggression questionnaire (BAQ). Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 70(5), 384–392.
    1. Archer, J., & Haigh, A. M. (1997). Do beliefs about aggressive feelings and actions predict reported levels of aggression? British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 83–105.
    1. Ashton, M. C., de Vries, R. E., & Lee, K. (2017). Trait variance and response style variance in the scales of the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5). Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(2), 192–203.

LinkOut - more resources