Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;20(1):2278632.
doi: 10.1080/15502783.2023.2278632. Epub 2023 Nov 12.

Evaluation of the reliability and educational quality of YouTube™ videos on sport nutrition topics

Anna Kiss  1   2 , Sándor Soós  1   2 , Ágoston Temesi  3 , Brigitta Unger-Plasek  3 , Zoltán Lakner  3 , Orsolya Tompa  2
Affiliations

Evaluation of the reliability and educational quality of YouTube™ videos on sport nutrition topics

Anna Kiss et al. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background: YouTube is one of the most widespread social media channels, which is of growing importance in science communication and health education. The validity of medical and health-related information available on YouTube cannot be assured, and videos often contain potentially misleading or inaccurate information. Communication on sport nutrition may have a profound effect on the change in nutrition behavior among athletes, so evidence-based nutrition information must reach athletes. The main goal of the research is to evaluate the quality, reliability, and applicability of sports nutrition YouTube videos as educational material for athletes.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was applied, and a systematic search was performed on YouTube. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated by applying the most frequently used and highly reliable scoring systems in the literature (e.g., DISCERN, Global Quality Score, and JAMA criteria) and a sports nutrition-specific scoring system (SNSS). Descriptive statistical analyses, two-sample t-test, Spearman correlation, Kruskal - Wallis, and Mann - Whitney U test were used to evaluate the results. A total of 114 YouTube videos met the inclusion criteria.

Results: In 25% of the videos, the sports nutrition information was presented by a dietitian, while in two-thirds, coaches and athletes and other professionals shared sports nutrition knowledge. In terms of video content, the three most common topics were nutrition and health (33%), special diets (21%), and the training diet (17%). For the majority of the videos that received low GQS, JAMAS, DISCERN, and SNSS scores, the accuracy and quality of the analyzed YouTube videos on sports nutrition were inadequate. Videos uploaded by dietitians achieved significantly higher DISCERN, JAMAS, GQS, and SNSS scores. The GQS, SNSS, and DISCERN scores of videos from sports organizations, nonprofit organizations, and independent user sources were lower compared to videos uploaded by academic and professional organizations. Popular sport nutrition videos among users that contain personal stories or the experiences of athletes were deemed less reliable by experts or showed lower educational quality. Henceforth, we found a negative correlation between video popularity and JAMAS, GQS, and SNSS scores.

Conclusion: This study revealed that sports nutrition videos on the YouTube video platform show low accuracy and reliability. Professionals working with athletes need to consider misconceptions from sports nutrition videos in their nutrition counseling practice. Due to the popularity of the videos, professionals and professional organizations could use YouTube as an online educational tool to increase the nutrition knowledge of athletes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of videos included in the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tam, R, Beck, KL, Manore, MM, et al. Effectiveness of education interventions designed to improve nutrition knowledge in athletes: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(11):1769–964. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01157-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexa . Top 500 global sites [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2023 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.alexa.com/topsites
    1. Haslam, K, Doucette, H, Hachey, S, et al. YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: an integrative review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2019. 1;53(1):53–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osman, W, Mohamed, F, Elhassan, M, et al. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022. 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szmuda, T, Syed, MT, Singh, A, et al. YouTube as a source of patient information for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(5):e2132. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources