Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Jan;257(4):498-501.

Trends in surgical revascularization for renal artery disease. Ten years' experience

  • PMID: 3795433

Trends in surgical revascularization for renal artery disease. Ten years' experience

A C Novick et al. JAMA. 1987 Jan.

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with surgical revascularization (SR) for renal artery disease (RAD) in 361 patients from 1975 through 1984 to illustrate the evolving role of SR in the management of these patients. The time intervals selected for comparison were 1975 through 1980 (n = 174) and 1981 through 1984 (n = 187). Since 1981, in patients with atherosclerosis, SR has been done more often in elderly patients (30% vs 10.4%), in patients with generalized atherosclerosis (87% vs 73%), and for the sole purpose of preserving renal function (36% vs 14%). Since 1981, fewer patients with atherosclerosis have undergone SR solely to treat renovascular hypertension (26% vs 41%). Since 1981, in patients with fibrous dysplasia, SR has been done in more patients with branch renal artery disease (70% vs 28%). These trends in the performance of SR have been due to the advent of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as effective therapy for certain patients, improved results of SR in elderly patients with atherosclerosis, an enhanced appreciation of advanced atherosclerotic RAD as a correctable cause of renal failure, and the development of more effective techniques for SR in patients with severe aortic atherosclerosis and branch RAD. The overall clinical results of SR remain excellent in properly selected patients with RAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types