Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 26:14:1259908.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259908. eCollection 2023.

A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?

Affiliations

A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?

Zhiwei Cui et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Etoposide is a broad-spectrum antitumor drug that has been extensively studied in clinical trials. However, limited information is available regarding its real-world adverse reactions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and evaluate etoposide-related adverse events in a real-world setting by using data mining method on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Through the analysis of 16,134,686 reports in the FAERS database, a total of 9,892 reports of etoposide-related adverse drug events (ADEs) were identified. To determine the significance of these ADEs, various disproportionality analysis algorithms were applied, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: As a result, 478 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) that were identified by all four algorithms were retained. These PTs included commonly reported adverse events such as thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, anemia, stomatitis, and pneumonitis, which align with those documented in the drug's instructions and previous clinical trials. However, our analysis also uncovered unexpected and significant ADEs, including thrombotic microangiopathy, ototoxicity, second primary malignancy, nephropathy toxic, and ovarian failure. Furthermore, we examined the time-to-onset (TTO) of these ADEs using the Weibull distribution test and found that the median TTO for etoposide-associated ADEs was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-32 days). The majority of cases occurred within the first month (73.8%) after etoposide administration. Additionally, our analysis revealed specific high-risk signals for males, such as pneumonia and cardiac infarction, while females showed signals for drug resistance and ototoxicity. Discussion: These findings provide valuable insight into the occurrence of ADEs following etoposide initiation, which can potentially support clinical monitoring and risk identification efforts.

Keywords: FAERS; adverse drug event; etoposide; pharmacovigilance; real-word analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The flow diagram of selecting etoposide-related ADEs from FAERS database.
FIGURE2
FIGURE2
The annual distribution of etoposide-related ADE reports from 2004 to 2022.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Time-to-onset of etoposide-related ADEs.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Age-based subgroup analysis of etoposide-related ADEs.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% CI for all positive gender-related ADEs. CI, confidence interval; ROR, Reporting odds ratio.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Volcano map of gender difference risk signal for etoposide. ROR, reporting odds ratios; P.adj, the p-value is adjusted with false discovery rate (FDR) method.

References

    1. Abdel-Azim H., Sun W., Wu L. (2019). Strategies to generate functionally normal neutrophils to reduce infection and infection-related mortality in cancer chemotherapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 204, 107403. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almenoff J. S., Pattishall E. N., Gibbs T. G., DuMouchel W., Evans S. J. W., Yuen N. (2007). Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 82 (2), 157–166. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100258 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson G. D. (2005). Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. J. Women's Health 14 (1), 19–29. 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.19 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson R. A., Remedios R., Kirkwood A. A., Patrick P., Stevens L., Clifton-Hadley L., et al. (2018). Determinants of ovarian function after response-adapted therapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (RATHL): a secondary analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. Oncol. 19 (10), 1328–1337. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30500-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbieri M. A., Cicala G., Cutroneo P. M., Mocciaro E., Sottosanti L., Freni F., et al. (2019). Ototoxic adverse drug reactions: a disproportionality analysis using the Italian spontaneous reporting database. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 1161. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01161 - DOI - PMC - PubMed