Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;157(5):387-394.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2217_20.

Mental Health Programme in India: Has the tide really turned?

B N Gangadhar  1 , Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar  1 , Kamaldeep Sadh  1 , Narayana Manjunatha  1 , Suresh Bada Math  1 , Rakesh Chander Kalaivanan  1 , Girish N Rao  2 , Rajani Parthasarathy  3 , Prabhat K Chand  1 , Prabha S Chandra  1 , Jagadisha Thirthalli  1 , Pratima Murthy  1 , Mathew Varghese  1 , Alok Mathur  4 , Bhavya K Bairy  1 , Chethana Kishore  1 , Guru S Gowda  1 , Vinay Basvaraju  1 , Shashidhara Nagabhushana Harihara  1 , Mohan K Isaac  5 , S K Chaturvedi  1
Affiliations
Review

Mental Health Programme in India: Has the tide really turned?

B N Gangadhar et al. Indian J Med Res. 2023 May.

Abstract

Mental disorders in India form a major public health concern and the efforts to tackle these dates back to four decades, by way of the National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) and its operational arm, the District Mental Health Programme (DMHP). Although the progress of NMHP (and DMHP) was relatively slower till recently, the last 4-5 years have seen rapid strides with several initiatives, including (i) expansion of DMHPs to 90 per cent of the total districts of the country, (ii) the National Mental Health Policy and (iii) strengthening the Mental Health Legislation by way of providing explicit provisions for rights of persons with mental illnesses. Among others, factors responsible for this accelerated growth include the easily accessible digital technology as well as judicial activism. Federal and State cooperation is another notable feature of this expansion. In this review, the authors summarize the available information on the evolution of implementation and research aspects related to India's NMHP over the years and provide a case for the positive turn of events witnessed in the recent years. However, the authors caution that these are still baby steps and much more remains to be done.

Keywords: District Mental Health Programme; India; National Mental Health Programme; primary mental healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flowchart of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sagar R, Dandona R, Gururaj G, Dhaliwal RS, Singh A, et al. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Mental Disorders Collaborators. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:148–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murthy RS. National mental health survey of India 2015-2016. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59:21–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wig NN, Murthy SR. The birth of national mental health program for India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57:315–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parthasarathy R, Channaveerachari N, Manjunatha N, Sadh K, Kalaivanan RC, Gowda GS, et al. Mental health care in Karnataka: Moving beyond the Bellary model of District Mental Health Program. Indian J Psychiatry. 2021;63:212–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murthy RS. National mental health programme in India (1982-1989) mid-point appraisal. Indian J Psychiatry. 1989;31:267–70. - PMC - PubMed