Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;33(2):507-517.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03541-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

Home care and quality of life among community-dwelling dependent older adults in Israel: a multiple mediator model

Rabia Khalaila  1   2 , Adi Vitman-Schorr  3
Affiliations

Home care and quality of life among community-dwelling dependent older adults in Israel: a multiple mediator model

Rabia Khalaila et al. Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between home care provision (combined paid formal home care and non-paid family-only home care) versus non-paid family-only home care with quality of life (QoL) of older adults, as well as the mediating effects of loneliness, social isolation and satisfaction with family relationships and support.

Methods: A convenience sample of 360 Israeli dependent adults aged 65 + responded to questionnaires. Using bootstrapping, we tested the strength and significance of the conditional indirect effects of the four simultaneous mediators.

Results: Using combined home care provision (paid formal home care and non-paid family-only home care) versus non-paid family-only home care for older adults was associated with lower QoL of care-recipients (B = - 4.57, t = - 2.24, p = 0.001, 95% CI - 8.58, - 0.56; R2 = 0.37), and was fully and strongly mediated by feelings of loneliness (B = - 1.92, p = 0.001, 95% CI - 3.66, - 0.79), social isolation (B = - 0.54, p = 0.001, 95% CI - 1.47, - 0.07) and satisfaction with family support (B = - 1.09, p = 0.001, 95% CI - 2.57, - 0.16). However, the indirect effect through satisfaction with family relationships was not significant. The highest proportion of the indirect effect size was (B = 0.42, 95% CI 0.13, 1.97) for loneliness, followed by satisfaction with family support (B = 0.23, 95% CI 0.01, 1.07), and social isolation (B = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01, 0.66), respectively.

Conclusions: Using combined formal home care might reduce the QoL of care-recipients by increasing their feelings of loneliness, social isolation and reduced perceived family support. Practitioners should encourage family members to continue with family regular support and contact alongside the use of formal home care in order to maintain satisfaction and QoL of older relatives.

Keywords: Home care; Loneliness; Older adults; Quality of life; Social isolation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gaugler, J. E., & Zarit, S. H. (2001). The effectiveness of adult day services for disabled older people. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 12(2), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J031v12n02_03 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalaila, R., & Litwin, H. (2011). Modernization and future care preferences: A cross-sectional survey of Arab Israeli caregivers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1614–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05606.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lowenstein, A., & Katz, R. (2000). Rural Arab families coping with caregiving. Marriage & Family Review, 30, 179–197. - DOI
    1. Khalaila, R., & Litwin, H. (2012). Modernisation and filial piety among traditional family caregivers: A study of Arab-Israelis in cultural transition. Aging & Society, 32(5), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000572 - DOI
    1. Sundström, G., Malmberg, B., & Johansson, L. (2006). Balancing family and state care: Neither, either or both? The case of Sweden. Ageing & Society, 26(5), 767–782. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources