Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 14;195(12):1466.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11967-3.

Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater through activated sludge process-a critical review

Anil Kumar Katare  1   2 , Aliya Tabassum  3   4 , Ashok Kumar Sharma  5 , Sarita Sharma  5
Affiliations
Review

Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater through activated sludge process-a critical review

Anil Kumar Katare et al. Environ Monit Assess. .

Abstract

The occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in water is a rising issue in the environment. These drugs in the waste may be toxic to aquatic organisms and humans as they disrupt the endocrine system, cause genotoxicity, etc. Several techniques were used for the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater, such as physical, chemical, physiochemical, and biological processes like adsorption, chemical coagulation, and activated sludge processes, but these techniques possess several merits and demerits, such as higher installation and operation costs. This technique is used to remove color and turbidity; reduce biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total suspended solids (TSS) to permissible limits for reuse of effluent; and prevent diseases caused by pharmaceutical wastewater. This review focuses on the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing drugs like antibiotics, depressants, and hormones, with the activated sludge process having several advantages like good quality effluent and low installation costs.

Keywords: Activated sludge process; BOD; COD; Pharmaceutical; Treatment method; Wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aguado, D., Montoya, T., Borras, L., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2008). Using SOM and PCA for analysing and interpreting data from a P-removal SBR. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 21, 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.08.001 - DOI
    1. Ahansazan, B., Afrashteh, H., Ahansazan, N., & Ahansazan, Z. (2014). Activated sludge process overview. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 5, 81. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2014.V5.455 - DOI
    1. Akiba, M., Senba, H., Otagiri, H., Prabhasankar, V.P., Taniyasu, S., Yamashita, N., Lee, K.-i., Yamamoto, T., Tsutsui, T., Joshua, D.I., 2015. Impact of wastewater from different sources on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in sewage treatment plants in South India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 115, 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.02.018
    1. Balakrishna, K., Rath, A., Praveenkumarreddy, Y., Guruge, K. S., & Subedi, B. (2017). A review of the occurrence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Indian water bodies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 137, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.014 - DOI
    1. Barnes, K. K., Kolpin, D. W., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Furlong, E. T., Zaugg, S. D., & Barber, L. B. (2002). Water-quality data for pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999-2000. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2, 317–326.

LinkOut - more resources