Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;15(1):215-227.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01504-3. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Phase III Trial Investigating the Glycemic Efficacy and Safety Profile of Fixed-Dose Combination Dapagliflozin and Linagliptin Over Linagliptin Monotherapy in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Metformin

Affiliations

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Phase III Trial Investigating the Glycemic Efficacy and Safety Profile of Fixed-Dose Combination Dapagliflozin and Linagliptin Over Linagliptin Monotherapy in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Metformin

Aditi Jain et al. Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin (10 mg) and linagliptin (5 mg) in comparison to linagliptin 5 mg (Trajenta) in patients with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin monotherapy.

Methods: The double-blind, randomized, multicentric, parallel-group phase III trial screened 287 adult patients with T2DM (age 18-65 years) from 16 sites across India. The recruited subjects were undergoing metformin monotherapy ≥ 1000 mg/day for at least 28 days. Patients with HbA1c of 7.5-10.5% (58-91 mmol/l) (n = 232) after 2 weeks of run-in period with linagliptin monotherapy and placebo dapagliflozin/linagliptin on metformin monotherapy were randomized (1:1) in parallel to once daily dapagliflozin/linagliptin 10/5 mg or linagliptin 5 mg for 16 weeks. Patients were stratified on the basis of HbA1c (≤ 9.0% and > 9.0%; ≤ 75 mmol/l and > 75 mmol/l)). A total of 225 subjects completed 16 weeks of treatment, 115 patients in the test group and 110 patients in the reference group.

Results: Dapagliflozin/linagliptin (p = 0.0003) exhibited a greater change in HbA1c from baseline than linagliptin (p < 0.0001) in 16 weeks (mean reduction, - 1.28% vs - 0.83%). Test group showed a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and body weight compared to the reference group. The FDC was well tolerated with adverse events being more frequent in the reference group. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in the study.

Conclusion: Dapagliflozin/linagliptin combination is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4)/sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor FDC approved in India for patients with T2DM. Potential limitations of this study are a small dose of dapagliflozin (10 mg) in the FDC, a short study duration (30 weeks) and a high minimum threshold for HbA1c (≤ 7.5%; ≤ 53 mmol/l). Results indicate the FDC to be a superior therapeutic option over linagliptin for patients with T2DM on metformin monotherapy.

Trial registration: CTRI/2022/08/044563; 01/08/2022.

Keywords: Dapagliflozin; Glycemic control; Linagliptin; Metformin; Randomized trial; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Aditi Jain, Dr. Abhay Vispute, Dr. Amol Dange, Dr. Arindam Naskar, Dr. Asish Mondal, Dr. B. Vivekanand, Dr. Balram Sharma, Dr. Deepak Varade, Dr. Dhaiwat Shukla, Dr. Girish Bhatia, Dr. Harshal Chaudhari, Dr. K. Ram Babu, Dr. Onkar Gavali, Dr. Sanket Sorate, Dr. Shaishav Bhanushali, Dr. Vaibhav Kothari, Dr. Vipul Khandelwal, Dr. Akhilesh Sharma, Dr. Roshan Pawar, Dr. Mayur Mayabhate, Dr. Vinayaka Shahavi, Dr. Aashishsingh Rajput, and Mukesh Jaiswal have no competing interests. The authors have no financial or non-financial interest to declare. No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ominous octet of type 2 diabetes [25, 26]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall study design and plan. Out of the eligible 232 patients, 225 (test, n = 115; reference, n = 110) completed the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean difference in HbA1c (%) from baseline (visit 2) to EOS (visit 6–week 16)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patients (%) with HbA1c < 7.0% (< 53 mmol/l) at week 16 (EOS)

References

    1. Khurana L, Durand EM, Gary ST, et al. Mechanisms for improving diabetes patient–provider communication through optimal use of e-clinical technologies. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:981–992. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S207008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetes Care. 2022;45:2753–2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunetti L. Management of type-2 diabetes mellitus in adults; focus on individualizing non-insulin therapies. P T. 2012;37:687–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes 2015, a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;38:140–149. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalra S, Das A, Priya G, et al. Fixed-dose combination in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: expert opinion from an international panel. J Family Med Primary Care. 2020;9:5450. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_843_20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources