Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 25;23(21):8712.
doi: 10.3390/s23218712.

Analysis of Return-to-Zero Error after the First Load of Load Cell

Affiliations

Analysis of Return-to-Zero Error after the First Load of Load Cell

Shudong Zhuang et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The return-to-zero error of the resistance strain load cell is most obvious in the first zero-return process during loading and unloading. To improve the accuracy of the load cell, it is necessary to figure out the cause of the error. The influence of the temperature, material, and weld cup were analyzed in this paper. It was concluded that the hysteresis is the main factor affecting the return-to-zero error after the first load. The relationship between hysteresis and zero-return error after first load was obtained by a data fitting algorithm. A method to improve the return-to-zero error after the first load was proposed.

Keywords: Pearson correlation coefficient; data fitting algorithm; hysteresis; zero-point error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of return to zero for multiple loading methods: (a) Directly to full loading; (b) Stages to full loading. (c) Multiple methods of full loading.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the interstitial atom in octahedron of a bcc crystal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stress-induced reorientation of interstitial atoms in bcc crystals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sensor return-to-zero curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sensor without weld cup (top) and sensor with weld cup (bottom).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Result of finite element analysis meshing.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Setting the sensor constraints.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Force machine loading diagram.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Aluminum sensor mounting and positioning diagram.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Return-to-zero error after the first load at each temperature.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Sensors strain diagrams with (right) and without (left) weld cup.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Strain in the strain zone for sensor with and without weld cup.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Curves of hysteresis with return-to-zero error after first loading.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Comparison of sensor return to zero with large hysteresis vs. small hysteresis.

References

    1. Abdeetedal M., Kermani R.M. An open-source integration platform for multiple peripheral modules with Kuka robots. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2019;27:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.08.003. - DOI
    1. Projoth T.N., Nanthakumar P. Analysis and prediction of cutting force through lathe tool dynamometer in CNC turning process. Mater. Today Proc. 2021;46:4174–4179. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.681. - DOI
    1. Zhang M., Qiu B., Zhu M., Qu X. Novel computation method of reducing ill-posedness for structural static distributed load identification by optimising strain gauge locations. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019;124:83–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.01.051. - DOI
    1. Byrne D., Esmonde H., Berry D., McGovern F., Creighton P., McHugh N. Sheep lameness detection from individual hoof load. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019;158:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.048. - DOI
    1. Saedin N.S., Muttalib M.F.A., Jusoh M.F. Performance Evaluation of Bar Load Cell Sensing System for Soil Moisture Measurement. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023;2550:012013. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2550/1/012013. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources