Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 Nov 3:2023.11.03.565449.
doi: 10.1101/2023.11.03.565449.

Using Vibrio natriegens for high-yield production of challenging expression targets and for protein deuteration

Affiliations

Using Vibrio natriegens for high-yield production of challenging expression targets and for protein deuteration

Natalia Mojica et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Production of soluble proteins is essential for structure/function studies, however, this usually requires milligram amounts of protein, which can be difficult to obtain with traditional expression systems. Recently, the Gram-negative bacterium Vibrio natriegens appeared as a novel and alternative host platform for production of proteins in high yields. Here, we used a commercial strain derived from V. natriegens (Vmax X2) to produce soluble bacterial and fungal proteins in milligram scale, which we struggled to achieve in Escherichia coli. These proteins include the cholera toxin (CT) and N-acetyl glucosamine binding protein A (GbpA) from Vibrio cholerae, the heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) from E. coli and the fungal nematotoxin CCTX2 from Coprinopsis cinerea. CT, GbpA and LT are secreted by the Type II secretion system in their natural hosts. When these three proteins were produced in Vmax, they were also secreted, and could be recovered from the growth media. This simplified the downstream purification procedure and resulted in considerably higher protein yields compared to production in E. coli (6- to 26-fold increase). We also tested Vmax for protein deuteration using deuterated minimal media with deuterium oxide as solvent, and achieved a 3-fold increase in yield compared to the equivalent protocol in E. coli. This is good news since isotopic labeling is expensive and often ineffective, but represents a necessary prerequisite for some structural techniques. Thus, Vmax represents a promising host for production of challenging expression targets and for protein deuteration in amounts suitable for structural biology studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CT production in E. coli and Vmax X2.
A SDS-PAGE analysis of CT samples obtained by expression in E. coli and purification by IMAC and ion-exchange chromatography. Periplasmic: periplasmic fraction, FT: flow-through. B Cation-exchange chromatogram and C SEC chromatogram of CT produced in E. coli. SEC fractions F1-F3 (first half of peak in C) on native PAGE (inset) still contained considerable amounts of CTB in the purified holotoxin sample. D SDS-PAGE gel from CT expression in Vmax X2, where CT is secreted into the growth medium. E SEC chromatogram of CT produced in Vmax X2, and F SDS-PAGE gel of SEC peak (compared to molecular mass marker).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Comparison of CT crystal structures.
CT produced in Vmax X2 (light green; PDB ID: 8QRE, this work), superimposed onto the published crystal structure of CT produced in E. coli (magenta; PDB ID: 1S5E). RMSD: 0.3 Å.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Toxicity and stoichiometry for commercial and Vmax X2 preparations of CT.
A CHO cells were incubated for 2 h with 10-fold dilutions of CT purchased from a commercial vendor (cv, filled squares) or purified from Vmax X2 (Vmax, open squares). An ELISA was then used to quantify cAMP levels from the intoxicated cells. Background-subtracted data were expressed as percentages of the response elicited from cells challenged with 100 ng/mL of the commercial toxin and represent the means ± standard deviations of nine technical replicates from three independent experiments. B Samples of CT purchased from a commercial vendor (cv) or produced in Vmax X2 (Vmax) were resolved by SDS-PAGE under reducing and non-reducing conditions. The samples (4 μg per lane) were visualized by Coomassie stain. The entire gel is shown, with a listing of the molecular masses from select protein standards.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. pLT production in Vmax X2.
A SDS-PAGE analysis of pLT samples obtained for expression in Vmax X2 and purification from the culture supernatant by galactose-affinity chromatography (GAC). B SEC chromatogram of pLT captured by GAC, and SDS-PAGE of SEC fractions (inset).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. GbpA production in E. coli and Vmax X2.
A SEC chromatogram (Superdex 200 Increase 30/100 GL column) of hydrogenated (1H) GbpA expressed in E. coli BL21 Star(DE3) (light orange) and in Vmax X2 (green). Several SEC runs were performed for each purification batch; therefore the intensity of absorbance is not correlated with yield. B-C SDS-PAGE analysis of GbpA hydrogenated (1H) samples expressed in Vmax X2 or E. coli BL21 Star(DE3) after the AEX and SEC purification steps. D SEC chromatogram (Superdex 75 Increase 30/100 GL column) of deuterated (2H) GbpA expressed in E. coli BL21 Star(DE3) (light orange) and in Vmax X2 (green). Again, SEC was performed in several injections per batch and the amounts shown do not correlate with yield. E-F SDS-PAGE analysis of GbpA deuterated (2H) samples expressed in Vmax X2 or E. coli BL21 Star(DE3) after the AEX and SEC purification steps. 1H refers to ‘common’ hydrogen (also called protium); 2H to deuterium.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. CCTX2 production in E. coli and Vmax X2.
A Galactose-affinity chromatography of CCTX2 produced in 1 L cultures from E. coli (light orange) and V. natriegens (green). B Matching SEC chromatogram comparing production in E. coli (light orange) and V. natriegens (green) for 0.5 L cultures. C-D SDS-PAGE of CCTX2 samples from expression in E. coli C41(DE3) and Vmax X2, matching purification fractions labeled in panel B.

References

    1. Papaneophytou C. P., and Kontopidis G. (2014) Statistical approaches to maximize recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: A general review. Protein Expr. Purif. 94, 22–32. - PubMed
    1. Rosano G. L., Morales E. S., and Ceccarelli E. A. (2019) New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: A 5-year update. Protein Sci. 28, 1412–1422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosano G. L., and Ceccarelli E. A. (2014) Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front. Microbiol. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haertlein M., Moulin M., Devos J. M., Laux V., Dunne O., and Trevor Forsyth V. (2016) Chapter five - Biomolecular deuteration for neutron structural biology and dynamics, in Isotope Labeling of Biomolecules - Applications (Kelmanin Z. B. T.-M. E., Ed.), pp 113–157. Academic Press. - PubMed
    1. Weinstock M. T., Hesek E. D., Wilson C. M., and Gibson D. G. (2016) Vibrio natriegens as a fast-growing host for molecular biology. Nat. Methods 13, 849–851. - PubMed

Publication types