Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2273697.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2273697. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

Association between sex hormones and anti-S/RBD antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines in healthcare workers

Affiliations

Association between sex hormones and anti-S/RBD antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines in healthcare workers

Simona Anticoli et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are the target population for vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as they are at a high risk of exposure and transmission of pathogens to patients. Neutralizing antibodies developed after COVID-19 vaccination decline within few months of vaccination. Several factors, including age and sex, can affect the intensity, efficacy, and duration of immune response to vaccines. However, sex-specific analyses of humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccines are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in anti-S/RBD (Receptor Binding Domain) responses at three different time points after the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in HCWs in relation to age, and to investigate the role of sex hormones as potential markers of response. Anti-S/RBD levels after two doses of the mRNA vaccine were collected from 521 HCWs naïve to COVID-19, working at two Italian Clinical Centers. Multiple regression analysis was applied to evaluate the association between anti-S levels and sex, age, and plasma levels of sex hormones. Significantly higher anti-S/RBD response to the COVID-19 vaccination was found in female HCWs, and a significant and more abrupt decline in response with time was observed in women than that in men. A novel, positive association of testosterone plasma levels and higher anti-S levels in male HCWs was found, suggesting its potential role as sex specific marker in males. In conclusion, understanding the sex-based differences in humoral immune responses to vaccines may potentially improve vaccination strategies and optimize surveillance programs for HCWs.

Keywords: COVID-19; anti-S/RBD; estrogen; healthcare workers; progesterone; sex difference; testosterone; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Measurements of anti-S/receptor binding domain (RBD) (by natural log transformed values and 95%CI) in the groups classified based on sex and age: (a) overall; (b) 20–44 years; (c) 45–55 years and (d) 56–85 years; p-values by Wilcoxon – Mann–Whitney test are shown for each post-vaccination time point.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Analysis of sex differences in anti-S/RBD waning. Scatters for the log values of anti-S/RBD antibody levels with the regression lines estimated using mixed regression model for males (M) and females (F), panel (a) all age groups; panel (b) 20–44 years; panel (c) 45–55 years; panel (d) 56–85 years; p-values relative to anti-S/RBD antibody slope differences in M vs F are shown in each panel.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The effect of sex hormones on the anti-S/RBD response to vaccination. Simple regression models for anti-S/RBD antibody levels applied in a subgroup of healthcare workers (HCWs, n = 112) using the log of sex hormone plasma levels as a covariate; 17-β estradiol: a (females) and B (males); testosterone: C (females) and D (males); progesterone: E (females) and F (males); beta estimates (slopes) with relative p-values obtained using regression models are shown in each panel.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Health and care worker deaths during COVID-19. Geneva (CH); 2021 Oct 20 [accessed May 11 2023]. https://www.who.int/news/item/20-10-2021-health-and-care-worker-deaths-d....
    1. World Health Organization . WHO and partners call for action to better protect health and care workers from COVID-19. Geneva (CH); 2021 Oct 21 [accessed May 11 2023]. https://www.who.int/news/item/21-10-2021-who-and-partners-call-for-actio....
    1. Moghadas SM, Vilches TN, Zhang K, Wells CR, Shoukat A, Singer BH, Meyers LA, Neuzil KM, Langley JM, Fitzpatrick MC, et al. The impact of vaccination on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(12):2257–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab079. PMID: 33515252. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson OJ, Barnsley G, Toor J, Hogan AB, Winskill P, Ghani AC.. Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(9):1293–302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6. PMID: 35753318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang H, Rao Z. Structural biology of SARS-CoV-2 and implications for therapeutic development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(11):685–700. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00630-8. PMID: 34535791. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types