Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i59-i72.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad062.

Procedural fairness and the resilience of health financing reforms in Ukraine

Affiliations

Procedural fairness and the resilience of health financing reforms in Ukraine

Yuriy Dzhygyr et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

In 2017, Ukraine's Parliament passed legislation establishing a single health benefit package for the entire population called the Programme of Medical Guarantees,‎ financed through general taxes and administered by a single national purchasing agency. This legislation was in line with key principles for financing universal health coverage. However, health professionals and some policymakers have been critical of elements of the reform, including its reliance on general taxes as the source of funding. Using qualitative methods and drawing on deliberative democratic theory and criteria for procedural fairness, this study argues that the acceptance and sustainability of these reforms could have been strengthened by making the decision-making process fairer. It suggests that three factors limited the extent of stakeholders' participation in this process: first, a perception among reformers that fast-paced decision-making was required because there was only a short political window for much needed reforms; second, a lack of trust among reformers in the motives, representativeness, and knowledge of some stakeholders; and third, an under-appreciation of the importance of dialogic engagement with the public. These findings highlight a profound challenge for policymakers. In retrospect, some of those involved in the reform's design and implementation believe that a more meaningful engagement with the public and stakeholders who opposed the reform might have strengthened its legitimacy and durability. At the same time, the study shows how difficult it is to have an inclusive process in settings where some actors may be driven by unconstrained self-interest or lack the capacity to be representative or knowledgeable interlocutors. It suggests that investments in deliberative capital (the attitudes and behaviours that facilitate good deliberation) and in civil society capacity may help overcome this difficulty.

Keywords: Health financing; Ukraine; accountability; ethics; fairness; health policy; implementation; participation; taxation; transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline of the reform process
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Thematic coding of the interview data

References

    1. Abelson J, Eyles J, McLeod CB et al. 2003. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy 66: 95–106. - PubMed
    1. Afsahi A. 2022. The role of self-interest in deliberation: a theory of deliberative capital. Political Studies 70: 701–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Béland D, Katapally TR. 2018. Shaping policy change in population health: policy entrepreneurs, ideas, and institutions. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 7: 369–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. 2012. Chapter 4. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D and Sher KJ (eds). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. Vol. 2, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 57–71. doi: 10.1037/13620-000 - DOI
    1. Bredenkamp C, Dale E, Doroshenko O et al. 2022. Health Financing Reform in Ukraine: Progress and Future Directions. Washington, DC: World Bank.