Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 14;13(1):19824.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46879-2.

The expanding range of emerging tick-borne viruses in Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region

Affiliations

The expanding range of emerging tick-borne viruses in Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region

Koray Ergunay et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We analysed both pooled and individual tick samples collected from four countries in Eastern Europe and the Black Sea region, using metagenome-based nanopore sequencing (NS) and targeted amplification. Initially, 1337 ticks, belonging to 11 species, were screened in 217 pools. Viruses (21 taxa) and human pathogens were detected in 46.5% and 7.3%, respectively. Tick-borne viral pathogens comprised Tacheng Tick Virus 2 (TTV2, 5.9%), Jingmen Tick Virus (JMTV, 0.9%) and Tacheng Tick Virus 1 (TTV1, 0.4%). An association of tick species with individual virus taxa was observed, with the exception of TTV2, which was observed in both Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis species. Individual ticks from pools with pathogen detection were then further screened by targeted amplification and then NS, which provided extensive genome data and revealed probable pathogen Haseki Tick Virus (HTV, 10.2%). Two distinct TTV2 clades were observed in phylogenetic analysis, one of which included closely related Dermacentor reticulatus Uukuviruses. JMTV detection indicated integrated virus sequences. Overall, we observed an expansion of newly documented pathogenic tick-borne viruses into Europe, with TTV1 being identified on the continent for the first time. These viruses should be included in the diagnostic assessment of symptomatic cases associated with tick bites and vector surveillance efforts. NS is shown as a useful tool for monitoring tick-associated pathogens in pooled or individual samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders of the research had no influence on results presented. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army, Navy or the Department of Defense. Material contained within this publication has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and / or publication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The maximum likelihood consensus tree of the phenuivirus polymerase sequences (783 amino acids), constructed using 1000 replicates. Branches achieving ≥ 95% bootstrap support are annotated with red dots. Tacheng Tick Virus 2 (TTV2) lineages are marked. Viruses are indicated by GenBank accession, name and isolate identifier where available. Sequences detected in the study are indicated by sample IDs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The maximum likelihood consensus tree of the nairovirus polymerase (A: 335 amino acids, B: 359 amino acids), glycoprotein precursor (C: 115 amino acids) and nucleocapsid (D: 135 amino acids) sequences. The trees are constructed using 1000 replicates. Branches achieving ≥ 95% bootstrap support are annotated with red dots. Tacheng Tick Virus 1 (TTV1) sequences in each alignment are marked. Viruses are indicated by GenBank accession, name and isolate identifier where available. Sequences detected in the study are indicated by sample IDs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Map indicating the tick sampling locations in the study. Sites with detectable human pathogens are marked by a triangle.

References

    1. Ogden NH, Mechai S, Margos G. Changing geographic ranges of ticks and tick-borne pathogens: drivers, mechanisms and consequences for pathogen diversity. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013;3:1. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vayssier-Taussat M, et al. How a multidisciplinary ‘One Health’ approach can combat the tick-borne pathogen threat in Europe. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:809–818. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rochlin I, Toledo A. Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: A mini-review. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020;69:781–791. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mansfield KL, Jizhou L, Phipps LP, Johnson N. Emerging tick-borne viruses in the twenty-first century. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:1. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ergunay K. Revisiting new tick-associated viruses: what comes next? Future. Virol. 2020;15:1. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2019-0149. - DOI

Publication types