Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 5;5(12):100734.
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100734. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Posthospital Multidisciplinary Care for AKI Survivors: A Feasibility Pilot

Affiliations

Posthospital Multidisciplinary Care for AKI Survivors: A Feasibility Pilot

Heather P May et al. Kidney Med. .

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Innovative models are needed to address significant gaps in kidney care follow-up for acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors.

Study design: This quasi-experimental pilot study reports the feasibility of the AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, a multidisciplinary approach to AKI survivor care based in the primary care setting.

Setting & participants: The study included consenting adults with stage 3 AKI discharged home without dialysis.

Interventions: The ACT intervention included predischarge education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. ACT was implemented in phases (Usual Care, Education, ACT).

Outcomes: The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included process and clinical outcomes.

Results: In total, 46 of 110 eligible adults were enrolled. Education occurred in 18/18 and 14/15 participants in the Education and ACT groups, respectively. 30-day urine protein evaluation occurred in 15%, 28%, and 87% of the Usual Care, Education, and ACT groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cumulative incidence of provider (primary care or nephrologist) and laboratory follow-up at 14 and 30 days was different across groups (14 days: Usual care 0%, Education 11%, ACT 73% [P < 0.01]; 30 days: 0%, 22%, and 73% [P < 0.01]). 30-day readmission rates were 23%, 44%, and 13% in the Usual Care, Education, and ACT groups, respectively (P = 0.13).

Limitations: Patients were not randomly assigned to treatment groups. The sample size limited the ability to detect some differences or perform multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of multidisciplinary AKI survivor follow-up beginning in primary care. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of laboratory and provider follow-up in ACT participants.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04505891).

Plain-language summary: Abrupt loss of kidney function in hospitalized patients, acute kidney injury (AKI), increases the chances of long-term kidney disease and a worse health care experience for patients. One out of 3 people who experience AKI do not get the follow-up kidney care they need. We performed a pilot study to test whether a program that facilitates structured AKI follow-up in primary care called the AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program was possible. ACT brings together the unique expertise of nurses, doctors, and pharmacists to look at the patient's kidney health plan from all angles. The study found that the ACT program was possible and led to more complete kidney care follow-up after discharge than the normal approach to care.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; acute kidney injury; care transitions; chronic kidney disease; patient care team; pharmacist; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ACT program implementation phases. During the first phase (‘Usual Care’), participants were identified by the electronic screening tool and passively followed, while the inpatient care team coordinated any education and outpatient follow-up as part of standard practice. In the second phase (‘Education Alone’), standardized kidney health education was delivered to patients and caregivers before hospital dismissal. The third phase (‘ACT’) included standardized education and care coordination of kidney function laboratory tests and provider assessment with 14 days of discharge. During all phases, nephrology follow-up was coordinated at the discretion of the inpatient care team, consulting nephrologists, or primary care provider.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to provider (PCP or nephrologist) and laboratory (SCr and urine study) follow-up across 3 groups. A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved provider and laboratory follow-up in the ACT group (P < 0.001).

References

    1. Kashani K., Shao M., Li G., et al. No increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury in a population-based annual temporal trends epidemiology study. Kidney Int. 2017;92(3):721–728. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siew E.D., Parr S.K., Abdel-Kader K., et al. Predictors of recurrent AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(4):1190–1200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pannu N., James M., Hemmelgarn B., et al. Association between AKI, recovery of renal function, and long-term outcomes after hospital discharge. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(2):194–202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coca S.G., Singanamala S., Parikh C.R. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81(5):442–448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heung M., Steffick D.E., Zivin K., et al. Acute kidney injury recovery pattern and subsequent risk of CKD: an analysis of Veterans Health Administration data. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(5):742–752. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data