Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
- PMID: 37965244
- PMCID: PMC10641702
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100493
Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
Abstract
Introduction: Failure to restore spontaneous circulation remains a major cause of death for cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has emerged as a feasible and efficacious rescue strategy for selected refractory CA patients.
Methods: Mechanical Circulatory Support was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of CA resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category.
Results: Top 5 knowledge gaps included optimal patient selection, pre-ECPR treatments, logistical and programmatic characteristics of ECPR programs, generalizability and effectiveness of ECPR, and prevention of reperfusion injury. Top 5 barriers to translation included cost/resource limitations, technical challenges, collaboration across multiple disciplines, limited patient population, and early identification of eligible patients. Top 5 research priorities focused on comparing the outcomes of prehospital/rapid transport strategies vs in-hospital ECPR initiation, implementation of high-performing ECPR system vs standard care, rapid patient identification tools vs standard clinical judgment, post-cardiac arrest bundled care vs no bundled care, and standardized ECPR clinical protocol vs routine care.
Conclusion: This overview can serve as an innovative guide to transform the care and outcome of patients with refractory CA.
Keywords: Cardiac arrest; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Mechanical circulatory support; Wolf Creek Conference.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Cindy H. Hsu was the lead investigator of the EROCA trial and Editorial Board Member of Resuscitation Plus. Jason A. Bartos and Demetris Yannopoulos were the lead investigators of the ARREST trial. Jan Belohlavek was the lead investigator of the Prague OHCA study. George Trummer was the lead investigator for the Controlled Automated Reperfusion of the whoLe body (CARL). None of the authors have any financial conflicts of interests.
Figures
References
-
- Gräsner J.-T., Herlitz J., Tjelmeland I.B.M., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation. 2021;161:61–79. - PubMed
-
- Tsao C.W., Aday A.W., Almarzooq Z.I., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145:e153–e639. - PubMed
-
- Kiguchi T., Okubo M., Nishiyama C., et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the World: First report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Resuscitation. 2020;152:39–49. - PubMed
-
- Perkins G.D., Callaway C.W., Haywood K., et al. Brain injury after cardiac arrest. Lancet. 2021;398:1269–1278. - PubMed
-
- Nishiyama C., Kiguchi T., Okubo M., et al. Three-year trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the world: Second report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Resuscitation. 2023;186 - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
