Treatment outcomes of regenerative endodontic therapy in immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 37966465
- DOI: 10.1111/iej.13999
Treatment outcomes of regenerative endodontic therapy in immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess which treatment modality regarding scaffold selection for immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis will be the most successful for regenerative endodontic treatment (RET).
Methodology: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase, and additional records until August 2022 were searched providing a total of 3021 articles, and nine of these articles were included for quantitative synthesis. The reviewers selected eligible randomized controlled trials and extracted pertinent data. Network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate treatment effects for primary outcomes (clinical and radiographic healing) and secondary outcomes (apical closure, root length and root wall thickness increase) following RET [mean difference (MD); 95% credible interval (CrI) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA)]. The quality of the included studies was appraised by the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Results: Six interventions from nine included studies were identified: blood clot scaffold (BC), blood clot scaffold with basic fibroblast growth factor, blood clot scaffold with collagen, platelet pellet, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). The PRP scaffold showed the greatest increase in root lengthening at 6-12 months (MD = 4.2; 95% CrI, 1.2 to 6.8; SUCRA = 89.0%, very low confidence). PRP or PRF achieved the highest level of success for primary and secondary outcomes at 1-6 and 6-12 months. Blood clot scaffold (with collagen or combined with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)) achieved the highest level of success for secondary outcomes beyond 12 months follow-up. A very low to low quality of evidence suggests that both PRP and PRF exhibit the greatest success evaluating primary and secondary outcomes within 12 months postoperatively compared to the traditional blood clot scaffold protocol.
Conclusion: Limited evidence suggests both PRP and PRF exhibit success in the short-term, not long-term. The value of this information stems in its recommendation for future randomized trials prioritizing both of these materials in their protocol.
Keywords: dental pulp revascularization; dental pulp revitalization; regenerative endodontics.
© 2023 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Akita, S., Akino, k. & Imaizumi, T. (2008) Basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates and improves second-degree burn wound healing. The International Journal of Tissue Repair and Regeneration, 16, 6350641.
-
- Alagl, A., Bedi, S., Hassan, K. & AlHumaid, J. (2017) Use of platelet-rich plasma for regeneration in non-vital immature permanent teeth: clinical and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. The Journal of International Medical Research, 45(2), 583-593.
-
- Almutairie, W., Yassen, G.H., Aminoshariae, A., Williamas, K.A. & Mickel, A. (2019) Regenerative endodontics: a systematic analysis of the failed cases. Journal of Endodontics, 45, 567-577.
-
- Alobaid, A.S., Cortes, L.M., Lo, J., Nguyen, T.T., Albert, J., Abu-Melha, A.S. et al. (2014) Radiographic and clinical outcomes of the treatment of immature permanent teeth by revascularization or apexification: a pilot retrospective cohort study. Journal of Endodontics, 40(8), 1063-1070.
-
- American Association of Endodontists. (2016) AAE clinical considerations for a regenerative procedure. Available from: https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/current... [Accessed 2nd December 2017].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
