Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) for paediatric hydrocephalus due to primary aqueductal stenosis
- PMID: 37966498
- DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06210-w
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) for paediatric hydrocephalus due to primary aqueductal stenosis
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in children with symptomatic triventricular hydrocephalus due to primary aqueductal stenosis.
Method: This is a retrospective analytical study. Patients who underwent either ETV or VPS as the first procedure for hydrocephalus due to primary aqueductal stenosis were included in the study.
Result: A total of 89 children were included in the study for analysis. The mean age was 8.4 years. Forty-four (49.4%) had their first surgery as ETV and 45 (50.6%) had their first surgery as VPS. Overall, 34 (38.2%) patients required a second surgery (either ETV or VPS) for persistent or recurrent hydrocephalus. The mean follow-up duration was 832.9 days. The overall complication rate was 13.5%. The mean timing of the second surgery after index surgery was 601.35 days. Factors associated with a second surgery were the presence of complications, high protein in cerebrospinal fluid, the relative change of frontal-occipital horn ratio (FOHR) and Evans' index. The survival of the first surgery was superior in ETV (751.55 days) compared to VPS (454.49 days), p = 0.013. The relative change of fronto-occipital horn index ratio (FOIR) was high in the VPS (mean 7.28%) group compared to the ETV (mean 4.40%), p = 0.001 group.
Conclusion: Overall procedural survival was better after ETV than VPS for hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis. VPS causes more reduction in linear indices of ventricles as compared to ETV, however, is not associated with the success or complication of the procedure.
Keywords: Complication; Endoscopic third ventriculostomy; Outcome; Ventricular indices; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Cinalli G, Spennato P, Nastro A, Aliberti F, Trischitta V, Ruggiero C, Mirone G, Cianciulli E (2011) Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Childs Nerv Syst : ChNS : Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 27:1621–1642 - DOI
-
- Kulkarni AV, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Investigators I (2016) International Infant Hydrocephalus Study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst : ChNS : Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 32:1039–1048 - DOI
-
- Kulkarni AV, Sgouros S, Leitner Y, Constantini S, International Infant Hydrocephalus Study I (2018) International Infant Hydrocephalus Study (IIHS): 5-year health outcome results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst : ChNS : Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 34:2391–2397 - DOI
-
- Pande A, Lamba N, Mammi M, Gebrehiwet P, Trenary A, Doucette J, Papatheodorou S, Bunevicius A, Smith TR, Mekary RA (2021) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric and adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 44:1227–1241 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
