Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 15;21(1):425.
doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02138-0.

Surface curvature-induced oriented assembly of sushi-like Janus therapeutic nanoplatform for combined chemodynamic therapy

Affiliations

Surface curvature-induced oriented assembly of sushi-like Janus therapeutic nanoplatform for combined chemodynamic therapy

Yanming Ma et al. J Nanobiotechnology. .

Abstract

Background: Chemodynamic therapy (CDT) based on Fenton/Fenton-like reaction has emerged as a promising cancer treatment strategy. Yet, the strong anti-oxidation property of tumor microenvironment (TME) caused by endogenous glutathione (GSH) still severely impedes the effectiveness of CDT. Traditional CDT nanoplatforms based on core@shell structure possess inherent interference of different subunits, thus hindering the overall therapeutic efficiency. Consequently, it is urgent to construct a novel structure with isolated functional units and GSH depletion capability to achieve desirable combined CDT therapeutic efficiency.

Results: Herein, a surface curvature-induced oriented assembly strategy is proposed to synthesize a sushi-like novel Janus therapeutic nanoplatform which is composed of two functional units, a FeOOH nanospindle serving as CDT subunit and a mSiO2 nanorod serving as drug-loading subunit. The FeOOH CDT subunit is half covered by mSiO2 nanorod along its long axis, forming sushi-like structure. The FeOOH nanospindle is about 400 nm in length and 50 nm in diameter, and the mSiO2 nanorod is about 550 nm in length and 100 nm in diameter. The length and diameter of mSiO2 subunit can be tuned in a wide range while maintaining the sushi-like Janus structure, which is attributed to a Gibbs-free-energy-dominating surface curvature-induced oriented assembly process. In this Janus therapeutic nanoplatform, Fe3+ of FeOOH is firstly reduced to Fe2+ by endogenous GSH, the as-generated Fe2+ then effectively catalyzes overexpressed H2O2 in TME into highly lethal ·OH to achieve efficient CDT. The doxorubicin (DOX) loaded in the mSiO2 subunit can be released to achieve combined chemotherapy. Taking advantage of Fe3+-related GSH depletion, Fe2+-related enhanced ·OH generation, and DOX-induced chemotherapy, the as-synthesized nanoplatform possesses excellent therapeutic efficiency, in vitro eliminating efficiency of tumor cells is as high as ~ 87%. In vivo experiments also show the efficient inhibition of tumor, verifying the synthesized sushi-like Janus nanoparticles as a promising therapeutic nanoplatform.

Conclusions: In general, our work provides a successful paradigm of constructing novel therapeutic nanoplatform to achieve efficient tumor inhibition.

Keywords: Asymmetric nanostructure; Chemodynamic therapy; Janus nanoparticles; Mesoporous; Nanocatalytic medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of sushi-like Janus mesoporous nanoplatform for combination therapy of a tumor
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Characterizations of mesoporous FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (A) Schematic illustration of the synthetic process of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (B, C) SEM and (D, E) TEM images with different magnifications of the obtained FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (F) Nitrogen sorption isotherms and the pore size distribution of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (G) PXRD Patterns of pre-synthesized β-FeOOH and FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (H) Elemental mapping of Fe, Si and O in the FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. Scale bar: 200 nm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TEM images of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles synthesized in different reaction conditions. (A) 2.7 mM CTAB; (B) 6.9 mM CTAB; (C) 9.6 mM CTAB; (D) 13.7 mM CTAB; (E) 20.6 mM CTAB; (F) 27.4 mM CTAB; (G) 3% (v/v) NH3·H2O; (H) 4% (v/v) NH3·H2O; (I) 8% (v/v) NH3·H2O. All conditions are fixed as experiment section in Supporting Information except for the altered one. Scale bar: 200 nm
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mechanism of surface curvature-induced oriented assembly. TEM images of products obtained at different reaction stages: fixed-sampling of reaction process. (A, D) 4 min. (B, E) 6 min. (C, F) 8 min. (G) Mechanistic analysis of radially winding growth behavior from the side view. (H) Mechanistic analysis of transversal growth from the front view. Scale bar: 200 nm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Catalytic and drug-loading properties of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles. (A) Absorption curve of methylene blue (MB) under different catalytic conditions (10 mM GSH, 10 mM H2O2, 125 µg/mL FMS, 125 µg/mL FMS + 10 mM H2O2 and 125 µg/mL FMS + 10 mM H2O2 + 10 mM GSH, respectively) determined by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy after being co-incubated for 3 h. The inset picture is the optical photograph of experimental group placed in absorbance-descending order. (B) Time-dependent curve of MB degradation under different GSH concentrations (0, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mM). The inset picture is the optical photograph of experimental group placed in absorbance-descending order. (C) GSH (1 mM) depletion by FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles determined by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy with DTNB as a probe. (D) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of FMS and GSH-treated FMS (upper the former, lower the latter). Fe2+ and Fe3+ refer to standard fit peaks. Original XPS signals are weak because of the low content of Fe element in FMS samples (~ 10%). GSH concentration: 10 mM. (E) Illustration of the Fe3+-Fe2+ reaction circulation, in which Fe3+ depletes GSH, Fe2+ catalyzes Fenton reaction and degrades MB. All conditions are fixed as the experiment section except for the altered one. MB concentration: 10 µg/mL. pH: 5.4
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
In vitro therapeutic effect of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles conducted with 4T1 breast cancer cells. (A) Cell viability of 4T1 cells incubated with FMS/FMS-DOX/C-FMS under different conditions. (B) Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of DCFH-DA stained 4T1 cells after incubation with fresh medium and FMS with or without H2O2 and GSH after 8 h. (C) CLSM images of Calcein AM (green, live cells) and PI (red, dead cells) co-stained 4T1 cells after incubation with fresh medium, FMS/FMS-DOX with or without H2O2 and GSH for 12 h. (D) CLSM images of 4T1 cells stained with DAPI after incubation with FMS-DOX at different time points. (E) Flow cytometric quantitative analysis of Annexin V-FITC/PI co-stained 4T1 cells after co-incubation with FMS/FMS-DOX with or without H2O2 and GSH under weak acidic (pH 5.4) conditions for 12 h. The dosage of FMS and FMS-DOX in the in vitro experiments was all controlled at 200 µg/mL. The concentration of H2O2 and GSH in the in vitro experiments was all controlled at 10 mM. Scale bar: 100 μm
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
In vivo therapeutic efficacy of FeOOH&mSiO2 Janus nanoparticles conducted with 4T1-tumor-bearing mice. (A) Schematic illustration of tumor model establishment and treatment process. The nanocomposite was administered intravenously at 0, 2nd, 5th, 9th, 12th, 16th, 19th and 21st days. (B) Eventual tumor growth rate of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice treated with saline (control group), FMS, DOX and FMS-DOX calculated with dissected tumor weight (Normalized with the group treated with FMS-DOX). Data are expressed as mean standard ± errors (n = 3). (C) Tumor volume growth curves of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice treated with saline (control group), FMS, DOX and FMS-DOX. Data are expressed as mean standard ± errors (n = 3). (D) Body weights of tumor-bearing mice during treatments. Data are expressed as mean standard ± errors (n = 3). (E) H&E staining of tumor tissues harvested from corresponding mice after 21 days of treatments. Scale bar: 50 μm

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A, Cancer Statistics. 2016. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2016, 66 (1), 7–30. - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song G, Cheng L, Chao Y, Yang K, Liu Z. Emerging nanotechnology and Advanced materials for Cancer Radiation Therapy. Adv Mater. 2017;29(32):1700996. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700996. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu L-H, Hu Y-R, Qi C, He T, Jiang S, Jiang C, He J, Qu J, Lin J, Huang P. Biodegradable manganese-doped calcium phosphate nanotheranostics for Traceable Cascade reaction-enhanced Anti-Tumor Therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(12):13985–94. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05836. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang M, Yan X, Nanozymes From New Concepts, Mechanisms, and Standards to applications. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(8):2190–200. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140. - DOI - PubMed