Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 1;136(1):13-22.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2023. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

Type 2 diabetes exacerbates changes in blood pressure-independent arterial stiffness: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the SUMMIT study

Affiliations

Type 2 diabetes exacerbates changes in blood pressure-independent arterial stiffness: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the SUMMIT study

Kunihiko Aizawa et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). .

Abstract

Greater central artery stiffness is observed in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Elevated blood pressure (BP) and altered arterial wall structure/composition in T2DM are generally considered as main drivers for this alteration. However, because conventional arterial stiffness measures are BP-dependent and as such an influence of BP remains in a measure, it is unclear if greater central artery stiffness is a function of greater BP, or due to changes in the structure and composition of the arterial wall. We aimed to measure BP-independent arterial stiffness (β0) cross-sectionally and longitudinally in T2DM. We studied 753 adults with T2DM (DM+) and 436 adults without (DM-) at baseline (Phase 1), and 310 DM+ and 210 DM- adults at 3-yr follow-up (Phase 2). We measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and used it to calculate β0. In Phase 1, β0 was significantly greater in DM+ than DM- after adjusting for age and sex [27.5 (26.6-28.3) vs. 23.6 (22.4-24.8) au, P < 0.001]. Partial correlation analyses after controlling for age and sex showed that β0 was significantly associated with hemoglobin A1c (r = 0.15 P < 0.001) and heart rate [(HR): r = 0.23 P < 0.001)] in DM+. In Phase 2, percentage-change in β0 was significantly greater in DM+ than DM- [19.5 (14.9-24.0) vs. 5.0 (-0.6 to 10.6) %, P < 0.001] after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline β0. β0 was greater in DM+ than DM- and increased much more in DM+ than in DM- over 3 yr. This suggests that T2DM exacerbates BP-independent arterial stiffness and may have a complemental utility to existing arterial stiffness indices.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate in this study a greater BP-independent arterial stiffness β0 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to those without, and also a greater change in β0 over 3 yr in people with T2DM than those without. These findings suggest that the intrinsic properties of the arterial wall may change in a different and more detrimental way in people with T2DM and likely represents accumulation of cardiovascular risk.

Keywords: aging; aorta; blood pressure; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparisons of β0 between people with and without type 2 diabetes (A), and between people with and without type 2 diabetes stratified by a history of cardiovascular disease (B). A: data are shown as means (95% confidence intervals) after adjusting for age and sex. *Significantly different from DM+. DM+, people with type 2 diabetes; DM−, people without type 2 diabetes. B: data are shown as means (95% confidence intervals) after adjusting for age, sex, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate. *Significantly different from DMCVD. †Significantly different from DM. CVD, people with cardiovascular disease only (n = 200); CTRL, people with neither type 2 diabetes nor cardiovascular disease (n = 236); DM, people with type 2 diabetes only (n = 426); DMCVD, people with type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular disease (n = 327); Healthy, “healthy” people (n = 74).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparisons of absolute and percentage-change in β0 (A and C) and in CFPWV (B and D) over 3 years in people with and without type 2 diabetes. Data are shown as means (95% confidence intervals) after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline β0 for the change in β0 and for age, sex, and baseline CFPWV for the change in CFPWV. *Significantly different from DM+. Δβ0, change in β0; ΔCFPWV, change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; DM+, people with type 2 diabetes; DM−, people without type 2 diabetes.

References

    1. Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation 107: 139–146, 2003. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000048892.83521.58. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strain WD, Chaturvedi N, Dockery F, Shiff R, Shore AC, Bulpitt CJ, Rajkumar C. Increased arterial stiffness in Europeans and African Caribbeans with type 2 diabetes cannot be accounted for by conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Hypertens 19: 889–896, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.01.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferreira MT, Leite NC, Cardoso CR, Salles GF. Correlates of aortic stiffness progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: importance of glycemic control: the Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 38: 897–904, 2015. doi:10.2337/dc14-2791. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG. Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation 106: 2085–2090, 2002. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000033824.02722.f7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso CR, Ferreira MT, Leite NC, Salles GF. Prognostic impact of aortic stiffness in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: the Rio deJaneiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 36: 3772–3778, 2013. doi:10.2337/dc13-0506. - DOI - PMC - PubMed