Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 14;9(4):230-238.
doi: 10.2478/jccm-2023-0028. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Limitation of Non-Beneficial Interventions and their Impact on the Intensive Care Unit Costs

Affiliations

Limitation of Non-Beneficial Interventions and their Impact on the Intensive Care Unit Costs

Sotiria Koutsouki et al. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). .

Abstract

Introduction: Using a plan to limit non-beneficial life support interventions has significantly reduced harm and loss of dignity for patients at the end of life. The association of these limitations with patients' clinical characteristics and health care costs in the intensive care unit (ICU) needs further scientific evidence.

Aim of the study: To explore decisions to limit non-beneficial life support interventions, their correlation with patients' clinical data, and their effect on the cost of care in the ICU.

Material and methods: We included all patients admitted to the general ICU of a hospital in Greece in a two-year (2019-2021) prospective study. Data collection included patient demographic and clinical variables, data related to decisions to limit (withholding, withdrawing) non-beneficial interventions (NBIs), and economic data. Comparisons were made between patients with and without limitation decisions.

Results: NBIs were limited in 164 of 454 patients (36.12%). Patients with limitation decisions were associated with older age (70y vs. 62y; p<0,001), greater disease severity score (APACHE IV, 71 vs. 50; p<0,001), longer length of stay (7d vs. 4.5d; p<0,001), and worse prognosis of death (APACHE IV PDR, 48.9 vs. 17.35; p<0,001). All cost categories and total cost per patient were also higher than the patient without limitation of NBIs (9247,79€ vs. 8029,46€, p<0,004). The mean daily cost has not differed between the groups (831,24€ vs. 832,59€; p<0,716). However, in the group of patients with limitations, all cost categories, including the average daily cost (767.31€ vs. 649.12€) after the limitation of NBIs, were reduced to a statistically significant degree (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Limiting NBIs in the ICU reduces healthcare costs and may lead to better management of ICU resource use.

Keywords: cost of care; end-of-life; intensive care units; non-beneficial interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest None to declare.

Figures

Fig.1.
Fig.1.
Patient flow chart
Fig.2.
Fig.2.
Total patients cost per category.

References

    1. Cruz VM, Camalionte L, Caruso P. Factors associated with futile end-of-life intensive care in a cancer hospital. Am J HospPalliat Med. 2015;32:329–34. - PubMed
    1. Huynh TN. et al. The opportunity cost of futile treatment in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1977–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B. et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–478. - PubMed
    1. Sprung CL, Truog RD, Curtis JR. et al. Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill: the consensus for worldwide end-of-life practice for patients in intensive care units (WELPICUS) study. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2014;190:855–66. - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, Metnitz B, Sprung CL, Timsit JF, Lemaire F, Bauer P. et al. End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database. Intensive care medicine. 2009;35(4):623–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources