Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug;37(4):565-582.
doi: 10.1007/s10334-023-01126-7. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

Physiological confounders of renal blood flow measurement

Affiliations
Review

Physiological confounders of renal blood flow measurement

Bashair Alhummiany et al. MAGMA. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Renal blood flow (RBF) is controlled by a number of physiological factors that can contribute to the variability of its measurement. The purpose of this review is to assess the changes in RBF in response to a wide range of physiological confounders and derive practical recommendations on patient preparation and interpretation of RBF measurements with MRI.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to include articles reporting on physiological variations of renal perfusion, blood and/or plasma flow in healthy humans.

Results: A total of 24 potential confounders were identified from the literature search and categorized into non-modifiable and modifiable factors. The non-modifiable factors include variables related to the demographics of a population (e.g. age, sex, and race) which cannot be manipulated but should be considered when interpreting RBF values between subjects. The modifiable factors include different activities (e.g. food/fluid intake, exercise training and medication use) that can be standardized in the study design. For each of the modifiable factors, evidence-based recommendations are provided to control for them in an RBF-measurement.

Conclusion: Future studies aiming to measure RBF are encouraged to follow a rigorous study design, that takes into account these recommendations for controlling the factors that can influence RBF results.

Keywords: Between-subject variation; Kidney; Perfusion; Renal blood flow; Within-subject variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The absolute change in renal blood flow for all physiological confounders. Each point refers to measurement reported by one empirical study and coded according to the applied method
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The relative change in renal blood flow (%) averaged across studies. Only factors with consistent impact reported in the literature are presented

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cupples WA, Braam B (2007) Assessment of renal autoregulation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292:F1105–F1123 - PubMed
    1. Pricher MP, Holowatz LA, Williams JT, Lockwood JM, Halliwill JR (2004) Regional hemodynamics during postexercise hypotension. I. Splanchnic and renal circulations. J Appl Physiol (1985) 97:2065–2070 - PubMed
    1. Koopman MG, Koomen GCM, Krediet RT, de Moor EAM, Hoek FJ, Arisz L (1989) Circadian rhythm of glomerular filtration rate in normal individuals. Clin Sci 77:105–111 - PubMed
    1. Persson PB (2002) Renal blood flow autoregulation in blood pressure control. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 11:67–72 - PubMed
    1. Barrett CJ, Navakatikyan MA, Malpas SC (2001) Long-term control of renal blood flow: what is the role of the renal nerves? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280:R1534–R1545 - PubMed