Meta-perception and misinformation
- PMID: 37972526
- DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101717
Meta-perception and misinformation
Abstract
Research on political misperceptions is flourishing across disciplines. Literature on misinformation susceptibility and political group meta-perceptions have arisen independently, both seeking to understand how inaccurate social beliefs of the first and second order respectively contribute to political polarization. Here we review these literatures and argue for greater integration. We highlight four domains where these two literatures intersect: how inaccurate group meta-perceptions may increase misinformation susceptibility, how misinformation may itself convey inaccurate second-order information, how second-order perceptions of misinformation belief may increase misinformation susceptibility, and how reputational concerns may affect misinformation engagement. Our hope is to illuminate fruitful avenues of future research and inspire scholars of political misperceptions to pursue unified theoretical models of how misperceptions drive negative political outcomes.
Keywords: Disinformation; Meta-perception; Misinformation; Misperception; Second order beliefs.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Science is permanent, politics is temporary: in an era of knowledge resistance, misinformation, and disinformation, researchers must continue to stand and deliver.JBI Evid Implement. 2025 Apr 1;23(2):138-141. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000512. JBI Evid Implement. 2025. PMID: 40237148
-
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Psychiatriki. 2022. PMID: 35947862 English, Greek, Modern.
-
Constituents' Inferences of Local Governments' Goals and the Relationship Between Political Party and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation: Cross-sectional Survey of Twitter Followers of State Public Health Departments.JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 10;2(1):e29246. doi: 10.2196/29246. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022. PMID: 37113808 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodal analysis of disinformation and misinformation.R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 20;10(12):230964. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230964. eCollection 2023 Dec. R Soc Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 38126058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1912440117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912440117. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33837144 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Democrats are better than Republicans at discerning true and false news but do not have better metacognitive awareness.Commun Psychol. 2023 Dec 18;1(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00040-x. Commun Psychol. 2023. PMID: 39242894 Free PMC article.
-
Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions.PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae324. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae324. eCollection 2024 Oct. PNAS Nexus. 2024. PMID: 39411086 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources