What do people believe to be the cause of low back pain? A scoping review
- PMID: 37972538
- PMCID: PMC10679815
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100562
What do people believe to be the cause of low back pain? A scoping review
Abstract
Objective: To explore how causal beliefs regarding non-specific low back pain (LBP) have been quantitatively investigated.
Methods: A scoping review based on the guidelines by the JBI (former Joanna Briggs Institute) was conducted. We searched Medline, Embase, Psychinfo, and CINAHL for relevant studies and included peer-reviewed original articles that measured causal beliefs about non-specific LBP among adults and reported results separate from other belief domains.
Results: A total of 81 studies were included, of which 62 (77%) had cross sectional designs, 11 (14%) were cohort studies, 3 (4%) randomized controlled trials, 4 (5%) non-randomized controlled trials, and 1 (1%) case control. Only 15 studies explicitly mentioned cause, triggers, or etiology in the study aim. We identified the use of 6 questionnaires from which a measure of causal beliefs could be obtained. The most frequently used questionnaire was the Illness Perception Questionnaire which was used in 8 of the included studies. The studies covered 308 unique causal belief items which we categorized into 15 categories, the most frequently investigated being causal beliefs related to "structural injury or impairment", which was investigated in 45 (56%) of the studies. The second and third most prevalent categories were related to "lifting and bending" (26 studies [32%]) and "mental or psychological" (24 studies [30%]).
Conclusion: There is a large variation in how causal beliefs are measured and a lack of studies designed to investigate causal beliefs, and of studies determining a longitudinal association between such beliefs and patient outcomes. This scoping review identified an evidence gap and can inspire future research in this field.
Keywords: Attitudes and beliefs; Causal beliefs; Illness perceptions; Low back pain; Questionnaire; Scoping review.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors report the following potential conflict of interest: AK's position at the University of Southern Denmark is financially supported by an unrestricted grant from the Danish Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Postgraduate Education. The funders were not involved in defining the research question, designing the study, analyzing the data, or interpreting the results.
Figures
References
-
- Leventhal H., Diefenbach M., Leventhal E.A. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognit Ther Res. 1992;16(2):143–163. doi: 10.1007/BF01173486. - DOI
-
- Bonfim I.D.S., Corrêa L.A., Nogueira L.A.C., et al. Your spine is so worn out' - the influence of clinical diagnosis on beliefs in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain - a qualitative study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(6):811–818. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.07.001. [published Online First: 20210723] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
