The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 37973031
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00178
The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%.
Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0).
Conclusions: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H763 ).
References
-
- Renshaw TS. Screening school children for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Apr;(229):26-33.
-
- Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):173-6.
-
- Shands AR Jr, Eisberg HB. The incidence of scoliosis in the state of Delaware; a study of 50,000 minifilms of the chest made during a survey for tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955 Dec;37-A(6):1243-9.
-
- Kane WJ. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):43-6.
-
- Thomas JJ, Stans AA, Milbrandt TA, Kremers HM, Shaughnessy WJ, Larson AN. Trends in Incidence of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Modern US Population-based Study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul 1;41(6):327-32.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials