Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;40(6):707-718.
doi: 10.1007/s12264-023-01139-1. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

TET1 Participates in Complete Freund's Adjuvant-induced Trigeminal Inflammatory Pain by Regulating Kv7.2 in a Mouse Model

Affiliations

TET1 Participates in Complete Freund's Adjuvant-induced Trigeminal Inflammatory Pain by Regulating Kv7.2 in a Mouse Model

Dengcheng Zhan et al. Neurosci Bull. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Trigeminal inflammatory pain is one of the most severe pain-related disorders in humans; however, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the possible contribution of interaction between ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1) and the voltage-gated K+ channel Kv7.2 (encoded by Kcnq2) to orofacial inflammatory pain in mice. We found that complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) injection reduced the expression of Kcnq2/Kv7.2 in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and induced orofacial inflammatory pain. The involvement of Kv7.2 in CFA-induced orofacial pain was further confirmed by Kv7.2 knockdown or overexpression. Moreover, TET1 knockdown in Tet1flox/flox mice significantly reduced the expression of Kv7.2 and M currents in the TG and led to pain-like behaviors. Conversely, TET1 overexpression by lentivirus rescued the CFA-induced decreases of Kcnq2 and M currents and alleviated mechanical allodynia. Our data suggest that TET1 is implicated in CFA-induced trigeminal inflammatory pain by positively regulating Kv7.2 in TG neurons.

Keywords: Facial pain; KCNQ2 potassium channel; TET1 protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors claim that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mechanical allodynia in the whisker pad region in CFA model mice and alterations in M currents and Kcnq2. A The animal before (upper) and after (lower) CFA injection in the whisker pad. B Mechanical allodynia was tested on naïve mice (n = 6) and on model mice on day 3 or day 7 after CFA injection (n = 6). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. C, D Two sets of sample traces of CFA (purple) and naïve (black) mice depicting the action potential (AP) of TG neurons. E–H Summary data of resting membrane potential (RMP; P = 0.0005, E), rheobase (P = 0.0218, F), AP threshold (P = 0.2720, G), and AP amplitude (P = 0.2514, H) in the TG neurons in naïve (n = 15) and CFA (n = 14) mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. I Two sample traces depicting the M current recorded in the TG neurons in the CFA group (purple) vs the naïve group (black). J Summary data of M currents in the TG neurons in naïve (n = 15) and CFA (n = 15) mice (P = 0.0076). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. K Relative mRNA expression of Kcnq2 and Kcnq3 in the trigeminal ganglia in naïve and CFA mice at day 3 and day 7. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. L Representative western blots and summarized results of Kv7.2 protein in the trigeminal ganglia in naïve and CFA mice at day 3 and day 7. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. M, N TG slices double-stained with Kv7.2 (red) and NF200/CGRP/Ib4 (green) antibodies. Scale bars, 50 µm.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Behavior, M currents, and APs in si-Kcnq2 and si-scrambled mice. A Mechanical allodynia was tested in si-Kcnq2 (n = 6) and si-scrambled (n = 6) mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. B Two sample traces depicting the M currents recorded in TG neurons in the si-Kcnq2 group (purple) vs the control group (black). C Summary data of M currents in the TG neurons in si-scrambled (n = 15) and si-Kcnq2 (n = 15) mice (P = 0.0110). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. D Two sets of sample traces of si-Kcnq2 (purple) and control (black) mice depicting the action potential (AP) in TG neurons. E–H Summary data of RMP (P = 0.0004, E), rheobase (P = 0.0003, F), AP threshold (P = 0.0013, G), and AP amplitude (P = 0.0749, H) in the TG neurons in si-scrambled (n = 15) and si-Kcnq2 (n = 14) mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Behavior, M currents, and APs in mice with Kv7.2 agonist ML213 injection after CFA injection. A Mechanical allodynia tested in ML213 (0.2, 1, 2, 10, 20 nmol) + CFA mice and CFA mice (n = 6). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. B Two sample traces depicting the M currents recorded in TG neurons in the ML213 (2 nmol) + CFA group (purple) vs the CFA group (black). C Summary data of M currents in TG neurons in the CFA (n = 17) and ML213 (2 nmol) + CFA (n = 17) mice (P = 0.0010). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. D Two sets of sample traces of ML213 (2 nmol) + CFA (purple) and control (black) mice depicting the action potential (AP) in TG neurons. E–H Summary data of RMP (P = 0.0109, E), rheobase (P = 0.0189, F), AP threshold (P = 0.1913, G), and AP amplitude (P = 0.8500, H) in the TG neurons in CFA (n = 15) and ML213 (2 nmol) + CFA (n = 14) mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in TET1 expression levels and coexpression of TET1 and Kcnq2. A Relative mRNA expression of TET1–3 in the trigeminal ganglia in naïve and CFA mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. B Representative western blots and summarized results of TET1 protein in the trigeminal ganglia in naïve and CFA mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. C, D TG sections from mice doubly stained with anti-TET1 (red) and anti-NF200/CGRP/Ib4 (green) antibodies. Scale bars, 50 µm. E TG sections were doubly stained with Kv7.2 (red) and TET1 (green) antibodies. Scale bar, 50 µm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Behavior, Kv7.2 protein, M currents, and APs in selective TET1 knockdown mice. A Mechanical allodynia in TET1 knockdown and negative-control mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. B, C Representative western blots and summarized results of TET1 and Kv7.2 protein in the trigeminal ganglia in TET1 knockdown and negative control mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. D Two sample traces depicting the M currents recorded in TG neurons in the TET1 knockdown group (purple) vs the control group (black). E Summary data of M currents in TG neurons in TET1 knockdown (n = 16) and control (n = 15) mice (P = 0.0047). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. F Two sets of sample traces of TET1 knockdown (purple) and control (black) mice depicting the action potential (AP) in the TG neurons. G–J Summary data of RMP (P = 0.0600, G), rheobase (P = 0.0075, H), AP threshold (P = 0.0990, I), and AP amplitude (P = 0.7819, J) in TG neurons in TET1 knockdown (n = 13) and control (n = 13) mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Behavior, Kv7.2 protein, M currents, and APs in TET1-overexpressing and CFA mice. A Mechanical allodynia. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. B, C Representative western blots and summarized results of TET1 and Kv7.2 protein in the trigeminal ganglia. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. D Two sample traces depicting the M currents recorded in the TG neurons in the TET1-overexpressing group (purple) vs the control group (black). E Summary data of M currents in the TG neurons in TET1-overexpressing (n = 17) and control (n = 18) mice (P = 0.0252). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. F Two sets of sample traces of TET1-overexpressing mice (purple) and control mice (black) depicting the action potential (AP) in the TG neurons. G–J Summary data of RMP (P = 0.0408, G), rheobase (P = 0.0382, H), AP threshold (P = 0.4559, I), and AP amplitude (P = 0.8986, J) in the TG neurons in TET1-overexpressing (n = 19) and control (n = 18) mice. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Horst OV, Cunha-Cruz J, Zhou L, Manning W, Mancl L, DeRouen TA. Prevalence of pain in the orofacial regions in patients visiting general dentists in the Northwest Practice-based REsearch Collaborative in Evidence-based DENTistry research network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146:721–728.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013, 33: 629–808. - PubMed
    1. Aczél T, Kecskés A, Kun J, Szenthe K, Bánáti F, Szathmary S, et al. Hemokinin-1 gene expression is upregulated in trigeminal Ganglia in an inflammatory orofacial pain model: Potential role in peripheral sensitization. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:E2938. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082938. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolf CJ, Salter MW. Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain. Science. 2000;288:1765–1769. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuner R. Central mechanisms of pathological pain. Nat Med. 2010;16:1258–1266. doi: 10.1038/nm.2231. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources