Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar;130(4):517-525.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02490-w. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

Accuracy of HPV E6/E7 oncoprotein tests to detect high-grade cervical lesions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Accuracy of HPV E6/E7 oncoprotein tests to detect high-grade cervical lesions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Laura Downham et al. Br J Cancer. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Cervical carcinogenesis is mediated by the HPV-E6 and E7 oncoproteins, considered as biomarkers usable in managing screen-positive women.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the accuracy of HPV-E6/E7-oncoprotein tests to detect underlying cervical-precancer and cancer. We included studies reporting data on oncoprotein test accuracy detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse. Random effects logistic regression models were applied for pooling absolute and relative accuracy.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity estimates ranged from 54.2% (95%CI: 45.2-63.0) to 69.5% (95%CI:60.8-76.9) and from 82.8% (95%CI: 50.4-95.8) to 99.1 (95%CI: 98.8-99.3), respectively in the population irrespective of HPV status. Higher sensitivity estimates ranging from 60.8% (95%CI: 49.6-70.9) to 75.5% (95%CI: 71.7-78.9) but lower specificity estimates ranging from 83.7% (95%CI: 76.1-89.3) to 92.1% (95%CI: 88.5-94.6) were observed in studies enrolling high-risk-HPV-positive women. Studies recruiting only HIV-positive women showed a pooled sensitivity of 46.9% (95%CI: 30.6-63.9) with a specificity of 98.0% (95%CI: 96.8-98.7).

Conclusions: The high specificity of oncoprotein tests supports its use for triaging HPV-positive women. However, oncoprotein-negative women would not be recommended to undertake routine screening, requiring further follow-up. Large-scale and longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate the role of E6/E7-oncoprotein detection in predicting the risk of developing cervical pre-cancer and cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PRISMA* flow diagram.
*PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Accuracy of oncoprotein test for CIN3+ detection in the population irrespective of HPV status, hrHPV-positive women, in HPV16/18-positive women, and in women living with HIV.
a Population irrespective of HPV status; b hrHPV-positive women; c HPV16/18-positive women; d Women Living with HIV; 1Testing with CncoE6; 2Testing with OncoE6E7; TP True Positives, FN False Negatives, TN True Negatives, FP False positives.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Accuracy of oncoprotein testing relative to other screening tests in the population irrespective of HPV status and in hrHPV-positive women.
a Population irrespective of HPV status; b hrHPV-positive women. Results from a meta-regression using as a covariate the type of screening test. ASCH+ Atypical Squamous Cells where High-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions cannot be excluded, ASCUS+ Atypical Squamous cells of Undetermined Significance, HC2 Hybrid Capture 2, HSIL High grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, RT Real Time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e197–e206. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Today GCO. Estimated number of new cases in 2020, worldwide, females, all ages 2020 [Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode_.... Access Date: March 3, 2022.
    1. Okunade KS. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40:602–8. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1634030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez AC, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Hildesheim A, Castle PE, et al. Rapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infections. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:513–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Gilham C, Dowie R, Stoykova B, Sargent A, et al. ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–150. doi: 10.3310/hta13510. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms