Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;75(4):3176-3179.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03966-0. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects Using Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap

Prashant Moon  1 , Girish S Mishra  2 , Jaykumar V Patel  3   4
Affiliations

Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects Using Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap

Prashant Moon et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: To study the use of medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) free flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Material and method: This was a prospective study. The patients with cancers of head and neck underwent excision of tumor along with neck dissection, and MSAP free flap was used for reconstruction.

Results: The free MSAP flaps were used in 30 patients to reconstruct head and neck soft tissue defects. There were sixteen male and six female patients with the median age of 40 years. The most common site of tumor resection was the tongue (14 cases), followed by buccal mucosa (12 cases), neck skin(2 cases), skin over parotid(1 case) and lip(1 case). Average flap size was 56 cm2. Thickness of the flap ranged from 4 to 8 mm. The length of the vascular pedicle ranged from 8 to 14 cm (12 cm mean) which provides sufficient length during vessel anastomosis. Arterial diameter ranged from 1.0 to 1.5 mm(Average - 1.25 mm) and venous diameter of both veins in pedicle ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 mm(Average - 2 mm) in size. Most flaps were based on two perforators. Primary closure was attained in 11 cases whereas 19 patients required split thickness skin graft(STSG). The average flap harvesting time was 45 min. Flap was failed in two cases.

Conclusion: MSAP is good alternative to FRAFF in the reconstruction of defect after resection of head and neck cancer.

Keywords: Head and neck reconstruction; Medial sural artery perforator free flap; Oral reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of InterestThere is no conflict of interest of any of author.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative flap planning
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subfacial dissection to look for perforators
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Length of pedicle
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Primary closure of donor site
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Post operative status
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cavadas PC, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, Gutierrez-de la Cámara A, Navarro-Monzonís A, Soler-Nomdedeu S, Martínez-Soriano F, et al. The medial sural artery perforator free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1609–1615. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kao HK, Chang KP, Chen YA, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1135–1145. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d180ac. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrawal G, Gupta A, Chaudhary V, Qureshi F, Choraria A, Dubey H. Medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018;8:61–65. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_137_17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McMahon JD, MacIver C, Smith M, Stathopoulos P, Wales C, McNulty R, et al. Postoperative complications after major head and neck surgery with free flap repair – prevalence, patterns, and determinants: a prospective cohort study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:689–695. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avery CM. Review of the radial free flap: is it still evolving, or is it facing extinction? Part one: soft–tissue radial flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.09.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources