Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;75(4):3639-3644.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04073-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

The Best Users of Cochlear Implants

Affiliations

The Best Users of Cochlear Implants

Amin Kashani et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive-analytical study was to compare the categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) in people with cochlear implants (CI) based on the implanted ear. CAP and SIR were evaluated in 184 people with CI of right (110) and left (74) ears every 6 to 24 months (6,12,18,24). The significance level was less than 0.05. People with CI in the right-ears had better mean CAP and SIR scores than the left-ears (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.001, 0.004, 0.004, 0.002, and 0.001, 0.010, 0.010, 0.006). There were the relationship between the means of language acquisition status at the time of surgery and the means of CAP and SIR scores (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.005, 0.031, 0.006, 0.019, and 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.002). The highest mean SIR scores were found in people with high school education (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.008). The means of CAP scores did not show a relationship with the level of education (P values6, 12, 18, 24= 0.388, 0.217, 0.297, 0.213). Mean SIR and CAP scores were not related to gender. People who received right ear prostheses after the language learning age and have a higher level of education are the best users of cochlear implants. Compared to others who do not have these facilities, they gain more ability in auditory-speech skills. Gender, does not affect these capabilities.

Keywords: Auditory; Cochlear implants; Speech.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean categories of auditory performance (CAP) scores of people with cochlear implants (CI) in time intervals of 6 to 24 months (n = 184).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores of people with cochlear implants (CI) in time intervals of 6 to 24 months (n = 184).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Central Auditory Processing Impairment in Renal Failure.
    Emami SF, Momtaz HE, Mehrabifard M. Emami SF, et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):1010-1013. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04345-5. Epub 2023 Nov 16. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440591 Free PMC article.
  • Hearing and Diet (Narrative Review).
    Emami SF. Emami SF. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):1447-1453. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04238-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440452 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Emami SF, Abdoli A (2019) Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children with Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-Synchrony. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71238–242. 10.1007/s12070-018-1445-x - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emami SF. Comparison of Cochlear Implants with Hearing Aids Regarding. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2020;97(27):171–177.
    1. Archbold S, Lutman M, Marshal D (1995) Categories of Auditory Performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. ; 16: 312-4. PMID: 7668685 - PubMed
    1. Allen C, Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, O'Donoghue GM. Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(5):631–633. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Emami SF, Gohari N, Ramezani H, Borzouei M. Hearing performance in the follicular-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Int J Otolaryngol. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/7276359. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources