The Best Users of Cochlear Implants
- PMID: 37974846
- PMCID: PMC10646021
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04073-w
The Best Users of Cochlear Implants
Abstract
The aim of this descriptive-analytical study was to compare the categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) in people with cochlear implants (CI) based on the implanted ear. CAP and SIR were evaluated in 184 people with CI of right (110) and left (74) ears every 6 to 24 months (6,12,18,24). The significance level was less than 0.05. People with CI in the right-ears had better mean CAP and SIR scores than the left-ears (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.001, 0.004, 0.004, 0.002, and 0.001, 0.010, 0.010, 0.006). There were the relationship between the means of language acquisition status at the time of surgery and the means of CAP and SIR scores (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.005, 0.031, 0.006, 0.019, and 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.002). The highest mean SIR scores were found in people with high school education (P values6,12,18, 24= 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.008). The means of CAP scores did not show a relationship with the level of education (P values6, 12, 18, 24= 0.388, 0.217, 0.297, 0.213). Mean SIR and CAP scores were not related to gender. People who received right ear prostheses after the language learning age and have a higher level of education are the best users of cochlear implants. Compared to others who do not have these facilities, they gain more ability in auditory-speech skills. Gender, does not affect these capabilities.
Keywords: Auditory; Cochlear implants; Speech.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Auditory perception in pediatric cochlear implant users with cochlear nerve hypoplasia.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Sep;160:111248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111248. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 35870254
-
Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):799-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. PMID: 24630030
-
[The imaging characteristics and prognosis of patients with cochlear implants whose cochlear nerves are not shown on MRI].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 7;56(12):1283-1291. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20210126-00038. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34963216 Chinese.
-
The Outcome of Cochlear Implantations in Deaf-Blind Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.Otol Neurotol. 2022 Sep 1;43(8):908-914. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003611. Otol Neurotol. 2022. PMID: 35970154
-
[Effectiveness of cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy and cochlear nerve aplasia].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;48(8):644-9. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24195820 Chinese.
Cited by
-
Central Auditory Processing Impairment in Renal Failure.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):1010-1013. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04345-5. Epub 2023 Nov 16. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440591 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing and Diet (Narrative Review).Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):1447-1453. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04238-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440452 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Emami SF. Comparison of Cochlear Implants with Hearing Aids Regarding. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2020;97(27):171–177.
-
- Archbold S, Lutman M, Marshal D (1995) Categories of Auditory Performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. ; 16: 312-4. PMID: 7668685 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous